mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Visual Explanations of Attention Maps for Transformer-based Medical Imaging

arXiv 2503.09535 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although Vision Transformers (ViTs) have recently demonstrated superior performance in medical imaging problems, they face explainability issues similar to previous architectures such as convolutional neural networks. Recent research efforts suggest that attention maps, which are part of decision-making process of ViTs can potentially address the explainability issue by identifying regions influencing predictions, especially in models pretrained with self-supervised learning. In this work, we compare the visual explanations of attention maps to other commonly used methods for medical imaging problems. To do so, we employ four distinct medical imaging datasets that involve the identification of (1) colonic polyps, (2) breast tumors, (3) esophageal inflammation, and (4) bone fractures and hardware implants. Through large-scale experiments on the aforementioned datasets using various supervised and self-supervised pretrained ViTs, we find that although attention maps show promise under certain conditions and generally surpass GradCAM in explainability, they are outperformed by transformer-specific interpretability methods. Our findings indicate that the efficacy of attention maps as a method of interpretability is context-dependent and may be limited as they do not consistently provide the comprehensive insights required for robust medical decision-making.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  7. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  8. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
  9. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
  10. 2023Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Modelscited by 382
  11. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  12. 2022Transformers in Medical Imaging: A Surveycited by 245
7 more
  1. 2021Is it Time to Replace CNNs with Transformers for Medical Images?cited by 60
  2. 2020Why Attentions May Not Be Interpretable?cited by 41
  3. 2023Know Your Self-supervised Learning: A Survey on Image-based Generative and Discriminative Trainingcited by 39
  4. 2023Towards Evaluating Explanations of Vision Transformers for Medical Imagingcited by 22
  5. 2022The Intrinsic Manifolds of Radiological Images and their Role in Deep Learningcited by 10
  6. 2023Be Careful When Evaluating Explanations Regarding Ground Truthcited by 3
  7. 2022Demystify Self-Attention in Vision Transformers from a Semantic Perspective: Analysis and Applicationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.