mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Foundations for Agentic AI Investigations from the Forensic Analysis of OpenClaw

arXiv 2604.05589 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic Al systems are increasingly deployed as personal assistants and are likely to become a common object of digital investigations. However, little is known about how their internal state and actions can be reconstructed during forensic analysis. Despite growing popularity, systematic forensic approaches for such systems remain largely unexplored. This paper presents an empirical study of OpenClaw a widely used single-agent assistant. We examine OpenClaw's technical design via static code analysis and apply differential forensic analysis to identify recoverable traces across stages of the agent interaction loop. We classify and correlate these traces to assess their investigative value in a systematic way. Based on these observations, we propose an agent artifact taxonomy that captures recurring investigative patterns. Finally, we highlight a foundational challenge for agentic Al forensics: agent-mediated execution introduces an additional layer of abstraction and substantial nondeterminism in trace generation. The large language model (LLM), the execution environment, and the evolving context can influence tool choice and state transitions in ways that are largely absent from rule-based software. Overall, our results provide an initial foundation for the systematic investigation of agentic Al and outline implications for digital forensic practice and future research.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

Builds on

6 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026A Survey of Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Challenges, Opportunities and Use-case Prototypes8 Jan

Other references · 5

  1. 2025AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challengescited by 169
  2. 2023ChatGPT for Digital Forensic Investigation: The Good, The Bad, and The Unknowncited by 17
  3. 2019Founding The Domain of AI Forensicscited by 5
  4. 2017Digital Forensic Approaches for Amazon Alexa Ecosystemcited by 3
  5. 2024Started Off Local, Now We're in the Cloud: Forensic Examination of the Amazon Echo Show 15 Smart Displaycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Architectural Obsolescence of Unhardened Agentic-AI Runtimes
  2. 2026Security of OpenClaw Agents: Fundamentals, Attacks, and Countermeasures
  3. 2026Clawed and Dangerous: Can We Trust Open Agentic Systems?
  4. 2026Dissecting Agentic Forensics: The Role of Triage, Prompting, and Evidence Arbitration in Open-World Fake Image Detection
  5. 2026From Assistant to Double Agent: Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks on OpenClaw for Personalized Local AI Agent
  6. 2026Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw
  7. 2026A Security Analysis of the OpenClaw AI Agent Framework
  8. 2026CHARLIE: An On-Premise Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation System for Evidential Reasoning in Forensic Science