mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From AI Technical Debt to Agentic Technical Debt: A Systematic Mapping of Root Causes and Manifestations in Agentic AI Systems

arXiv 2608.01001 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.CR cs.SEcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of Agentic AI systems, characterized by autonomous reasoning, multi-agent collaboration, tool orchestration, adaptive decision-making, and persistent memory, represents a fundamental shift from traditional AI pipelines to dynamic software ecosystems. While AI Technical Debt (AITD) has been widely studied in machine learning and software engineering, existing models assume static, component-level architectures and fail to capture the dynamic and emergent behaviors of agentic environments. To address this gap, this paper introduces Agentic Technical Debt (AgTD), defined as technical debt that emerges, accumulates, propagates, and amplifies due to the autonomous and collaborative nature of Agentic AI systems. Building on our prior systematic scoping review of 31 AITDs across seven root-cause categories, we employ a theory-informed transformation methodology to reinterpret these debts in Agentic AI through direct transformation, contextual transformation, and manifestation expansion. We present the first systematic mapping of established AITDs to their agentic manifestations, showing how conventional debts evolve into system-level liabilities, including memory inconsistencies, orchestration fragility, cascading failures, and unsafe autonomous decision-making. Our findings show that technical debt extends beyond software artifacts to encompass agent behaviors, coordination mechanisms, and interactions among agents, tools, and execution environments. We further examine its implications for AI Trust, Risk, and Security Management (AI TRiSM), highlighting impacts on trustworthiness, governance, security, operational resilience, and Sustainability Technical Debt. Overall, this work establishes AgTD as a foundational software engineering construct and provides a transformation framework, taxonomy, and research agenda for managing technical debt in autonomous multi-agent AI systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 146 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.

Builds on

29 of 146 references.

References · 29

  1. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  2. 2025TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systemscited by 59
  3. 2021Collaboration Challenges in Building ML-Enabled Systems: Communication, Documentation, Engineering, and Processcited by 56
  4. 2025Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Applications, and Future Directionscited by 48
  5. 2018Software Engineering Challenges of Deep Learningcited by 41
  6. 2022Toward Understanding Deep Learning Framework Bugscited by 26
  7. 2019Studying Software Engineering Patterns for Designing Machine Learning Systemscited by 24
  8. 2019Requirements Engineering Challenges in Building AI-Based Complex Systemscited by 21
  9. 2021Characterizing Technical Debt and Antipatterns in AI-Based Systems: A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 21
  10. 2021The Prevalence of Code Smells in Machine Learning projectscited by 16
  11. 2021Design Smells in Deep Learning Programs: An Empirical Studycited by 10
  12. 2022Automatic Identification of Self-Admitted Technical Debt from Four Different Sourcescited by 10
17 more
  1. 2022Code Smells for Machine Learning Applicationscited by 8
  2. 2022Quality issues in Machine Learning Software Systemscited by 7
  3. 2022Identifying Self-Admitted Technical Debt in Issue Tracking Systems using Machine Learningcited by 6
  4. 2021Clones in Deep Learning Code: What, Where, and Why?cited by 5
  5. 2022Data Smells in Public Datasetscited by 5
  6. 2024Maintainability Challenges in ML: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 5
  7. 2026Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system securitycited by 5
  8. 2022Data Smells: Categories, Causes and Consequences, and Detection of Suspicious Data in AI-based Systemscited by 4
  9. 2019Technical Debt in Data-Intensive Software Systemscited by 3
  10. 2021An Exploratory Study on the Introduction and Removal of Different Types of Technical Debtcited by 3
  11. 2023An architectural technical debt index based on machine learning and architectural smellscited by 3
  12. 2026Foundations for Agentic AI Investigations from the Forensic Analysis of OpenClawcited by 3
  13. 2026Socio-Technical Anti-Patterns in Building ML-Enabled Software: Insights from Leaders on the Forefrontcited by 3
  14. 2023DebtViz: A Tool for Identifying, Measuring, Visualizing, and Monitoring Self-Admitted Technical Debtcited by 2
  15. 2024SATDAUG -- A Balanced and Augmented Dataset for Detecting Self-Admitted Technical Debtcited by 1
  16. 2025Investigating Issues that Lead to Code Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systemscited by 1
  17. 2026On AI Safety and Security Technical Debt in Engineering AI-Enabled Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Governing Technical Debt in Agentic AI Systems
  2. 2026Watts and Debts of Agentic Frameworks: An Empirical Study (Registered Report)
  3. 2026Studying, Identifying, and Fixing Hidden Technical Debt in AI-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems
  4. 2026Modeling Agentic Technical Debt and Stochastic Tax: A Standalone Framework for Measurement, Simulation, and Dashboarding
  5. 2026AI Writes Code, Humans Pay the Debt. An Empirical Study on the Sustainability and Evolution of Agent-Generated Code
  6. 2026Agentic Software: How AI Agents Are Restructuring the Software Paradigm
  7. 2026Agentic AI in the Software Development Lifecycle: Architecture, Empirical Evidence, and the Reshaping of Software Engineering
  8. 2026From Determinism to Delegation: AI-Native Software Engineering and the Evolution of the Agentic Engineer