Human Values Matter: Investigating How Misalignment Shapes Collective Behaviors in LLM Agent Communities
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
As LLMs become increasingly integrated into human society, evaluating their orientations on human values from social science has drawn growing attention. Nevertheless, it is still unclear why human values matter for LLMs, especially in LLM-based multi-agent systems, where group-level failures may accumulate from individually misaligned actions. We ask whether misalignment with human values alters the collective behavior of LLM agents and what changes it induces? In this work, we introduce CIVA, a controlled multi-agent environment grounded in social science theories, where LLM agents form a community and autonomously communicate, explore, and compete for resources, enabling systematic manipulation of value prevalence and behavioral analysis. Through comprehensive simulation experiments, we reveal three key findings. (1) We identify several structurally critical values that substantially shape the community's collective dynamics, including those diverging from LLMs' original orientations. Triggered by the misspecification of these values, we (2) detect system failure modes, e.g., catastrophic collapse, at the macro level, and (3) observe emergent behaviors like deception and power-seeking at the micro level. These results offer quantitative evidence that human values are essential for collective outcomes in LLMs and motivate future multi-agent value alignment.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 45 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.
Builds on
45 of 92 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Value-Based Large Language Model Agent Simulation for Mutual Evaluation of Trust and Interpersonal Closeness16 Jul
- 2025Investigating and Extending Homans' Social Exchange Theory with Large Language Model based Agents18 Feb
- 2025Multi-Agent Simulator Drives Language Models for Legal Intensive Interaction8 Feb
- 2024Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM Agents25 Apr
- 2024Shall We Team Up: Exploring Spontaneous Cooperation of Competing LLM Agents19 Feb
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior7 Apr
Other references · 39
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
- 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
- 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
- 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learningcited by 251
27 more
- 2023Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMscited by 211
- 2025MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agentscited by 169
- 2024Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulationscited by 164
- 2024AgentScope: A Flexible yet Robust Multi-Agent Platformcited by 120
- 2022Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?cited by 101
- 2022When to Make Exceptions: Exploring Language Models as Accounts of Human Moral Judgmentcited by 93
- 2024Escalation Risks from Language Models in Military and Diplomatic Decision-Makingcited by 61
- 2024Are Large Language Models Consistent over Value-laden Questions?cited by 58
- 2024DailyDilemmas: Revealing Value Preferences of LLMs with Quandaries of Daily Lifecited by 57
- 2023Value FULCRA: Mapping Large Language Models to the Multidimensional Spectrum of Basic Human Valuescited by 49
- 2025Mind the Value-Action Gap: Do LLMs Act in Alignment with Their Values?cited by 49
- 2024What are human values, and how do we align AI to them?cited by 32
- 2024LLM-GLOBE: A Benchmark Evaluating the Cultural Values Embedded in LLM Outputcited by 27
- 2023Denevil: Towards Deciphering and Navigating the Ethical Values of Large Language Models via Instruction Learningcited by 26
- 2025Nuclear Deployed: Analyzing Catastrophic Risks in Decision-making of Autonomous LLM Agentscited by 23
- 2024Two Types of AI Existential Risk: Decisive and Accumulativecited by 21
- 2024ValueCompass: A Framework for Measuring Contextual Value Alignment Between Human and LLMscited by 20
- 2025Searching for Privacy Risks in LLM Agents via Simulationcited by 19
- 2024Assistive Large Language Model Agents for Socially-Aware Negotiation Dialoguescited by 18
- 2025Value Portrait: Assessing Language Models' Values through Psychometrically and Ecologically Valid Itemscited by 18
- 2025Internal Value Alignment in Large Language Models through Controlled Value Vector Activationcited by 14
- 2025Generative Value Conflicts Reveal LLM Prioritiescited by 13
- 2025Do Large Language Model Agents Exhibit a Survival Instinct? An Empirical Study in a Sugarscape-Style Simulationcited by 9
- 2023A Review of the Evidence for Existential Risk from AI via Misaligned Power-Seekingcited by 7
- 2025Unintended Harms of Value-Aligned LLMs: Psychological and Empirical Insightscited by 6
- 2023Multi-Value Alignment in Normative Multi-Agent System: An Evolutionary Optimisation Approachcited by 4
- 2025ValueSim: Generating Backstories to Model Individual Value Systemscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Controllable Affective Generation via Latent Vector Steeringcited by 0
- 2026WolfSociety: Understanding Collective Risk from Harmful-Agent Scaling in Financial Agent Societiescited by 0
- 2026From Certain Doom to Survival: Agent-Driven Self-Governance in LLM Agent Societiescited by 0
- 2026From Static Personal Values to Contextualized Personalization: Bayesian Personalized Value Alignment for LLMscited by 0
- 2026From Static Personal Values to Contextualized Personalization: Bayesian Personalized Value Alignment for LLMs24 Sep 2026
- 2026From Certain Doom to Survival: Agent-Driven Self-Governance in LLM Agent Societies18 Sep 2026
- 2026WolfSociety: Understanding Collective Risk from Harmful-Agent Scaling in Financial Agent Societies4 Sep 2026
- 2026Controllable Affective Generation via Latent Vector Steering26 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social Behavior?
- 2025On the Dynamics of Multi-Agent LLM Communities Driven by Value Diversity
- 2026Collective cooperation without individual fidelity in LLM agents
- 2025The Coming Crisis of Multi-Agent Misalignment: AI Alignment Must Be a Dynamic and Social Process
- 2025Group size effects and collective misalignment in LLM multi-agent systems
- 2026From Process Loss to Assembly Bonus: Human-Grounded Diagnosis of Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration
- 2026Stop Drawing Scientific Claims from LLM Social Simulations Without Robustness Audits
- 2025The Role of Social Learning and Collective Norm Formation in Fostering Cooperation in LLM Multi-Agent Systems