mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Governance-Constrained Agentic AI: Blockchain-Enforced Human Oversight for Safety-Critical Wildfire Monitoring

arXiv 2604.04265 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

The AI-based sensing and autonomous monitoring have become the main components of wildfire early detection, but current systems do not provide adaptive inter-agent coordination, structurally defined human control, and cryptographically verifiable responsibility. Purely autonomous alert dissemination in the context of safety critical disasters poses threats of false alarming, governance failure and lack of trust in the system. This paper provides a blockchain-based governance-conscious agentic AI architecture of trusted wildfire early warning. The monitoring of wildfires is modeled as a constrained partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) that accounts for the detection latency, false alarms reduction and resource consumption with clear governance constraints. Hierarchical multi-agent coordination means dynamic risk-adaptive reallocation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). With risk-adaptive policies, a permissioned blockchain layer sets mandatory human-authorization as a state-transition invariant as a smart contract. We build formal assurances such as integrity of alerts, human control, non-repudiation and limited detection latency assumptions of Byzantine fault. Security analysis shows that it is resistant to alert injections, replays, and tampering attacks. High-fidelity simulation environment experimental evaluation of governance enforcement demonstrates that it presents limited operational overhead and decreases false public alerts and maintains adaptive detection performance. This work is a step towards a principled design paradigm of reliable AI systems by incorporating accountability into the agentic control loop of disaster intelligence systems that demand safety in their application.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.

Builds on

5 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Blockchain-Monitored Agentic AI Architecture for Trusted Perception-Reasoning-Action Pipelines24 Dec

Other references · 4

  1. 2018Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchainscited by 48
  2. 2025Agentic AI Framework for Individuals with Disabilities and Neurodivergence: A Multi-Agent System for Healthy Eating, Daily Routines, and Inclusive Well-Beingcited by 8
  3. 2025Agentic AI Framework for Cloudburst Prediction and Coordinated Responsecited by 6
  4. 2025FinAgent: An Agentic AI Framework Integrating Personal Finance and Nutrition Planningcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Black Box for Agentic Processes: Blockchain-Anchored Evidence for AI Agent Communication, Human Oversight, and GRC Audits
  2. 2026Autonomous Agents on Blockchains: Standards, Execution Models, and Trust Boundaries
  3. 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
  4. 2026Agentic AI for Safety-critical Multi-drone Systems: Challenges and Opportunities
  5. 2026SolarChain-Eval: A Physics-Constrained Benchmark for Trustworthy Economic Agents in Decentralized Energy Markets
  6. 2025MI9: An Integrated Runtime Governance Framework for Agentic AI
  7. 2026Blockchain-Enabled Artificial Intelligence and AI Agents for Secure Data Sharing and Cybersecurity Applications
  8. 2025Enabling Regulatory Multi-Agent Collaboration: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions