Hierarchical Co-Embedding of Font Shapes and Impression Tags
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Font shapes can evoke a wide range of impressions, but the correspondence between fonts and impression descriptions is not one-to-one: some impressions are broadly compatible with diverse styles, whereas others strongly constrain the set of plausible fonts. We refer to this graded constraint strength as style specificity. In this paper, we propose a hyperbolic co-embedding framework that models font--impression correspondence through entailment rather than simple paired alignment. Font images and impression descriptions, represented as single tags or tag sets, are embedded in a shared hyperbolic space with two complementary entailment constraints: impression-to-font entailment and low-to-high style-specificity entailment among impressions. This formulation induces a radial structure in which low style-specificity impressions lie near the origin and high style-specificity impressions lie farther away, yielding an interpretable geometric measure of how strongly an impression constrains font style. Experiments on the MyFonts dataset demonstrate improved bidirectional retrieval over strong one-to-one baselines. In addition, traversal and tag-level analyses show that the learned space captures a coherent progression from ambiguous to more style-specific impressions and provides a meaningful, data-driven quantification of style specificity.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
20 of 36 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
- 2018Learning Continuous Hierarchies in the Lorentz Model of Hyperbolic Geometrycited by 261
- 2018Representation Tradeoffs for Hyperbolic Embeddingscited by 204
- 2023Hyperbolic Image-Text Representationscited by 132
- 2024Compositional Entailment Learning for Hyperbolic Vision-Language Modelscited by 72
- 2022Hyperbolic Contrastive Learning for Visual Representations beyond Objectscited by 58
- 2019Large-scale Tag-based Font Retrieval with Generative Feature Learningcited by 22
- 2025HLFormer: Enhancing Partially Relevant Video Retrieval with Hyperbolic Learningcited by 17
- 2021Impressions2Font: Generating Fonts by Specifying Impressionscited by 10
8 more
- 2024FontCLIP: A Semantic Typography Visual-Language Model for Multilingual Font Applicationscited by 8
- 2021Shared Latent Space of Font Shapes and Their Noisy Impressionscited by 7
- 2022Font Generation with Missing Impression Labelscited by 6
- 2025Is Hyperbolic Space All You Need for Medical Anomaly Detection?cited by 5
- 2024GRIF-DM: Generation of Rich Impression Fonts using Diffusion Modelscited by 4
- 2024Impression-CLIP: Contrastive Shape-Impression Embedding for Fontscited by 3
- 2023Exploring the Effects of Japanese Font Designs on Impression Formation and Decision-Making in Text-Based Communicationcited by 2
- 2025Embedding Font Impression Word Tags Based on Co-occurrencecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.