When Sinks Help or Hurt: Unified Framework for Attention Sink in Large Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency
Abstract (arXiv)
Attention sinks are defined as tokens that attract disproportionate attention. While these have been studied in single modality transformers, their cross-modal impact in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLM) remains largely unexplored: are they redundant artifacts or essential global priors? This paper first categorizes visual sinks into two distinct categories: ViT-emerged sinks (V-sinks), which propagate from the vision encoder, and LLM-emerged sinks (L-sinks), which arise within deep LLM layers. Based on the new definition, our analysis reveals a fundamental performance trade-off: while sinks effectively encode global scene-level priors, their dominance can suppress the fine-grained visual evidence required for local perception. Furthermore, we identify specific functional layers where modulating these sinks most significantly impacts downstream performance. To leverage these insights, we propose Layer-wise Sink Gating (LSG), a lightweight, plug-and-play module that dynamically scales the attention contributions of V-sink and the rest visual tokens. LSG is trained via standard next-token prediction, requiring no task-specific supervision while keeping the LVLM backbone frozen. In most layers, LSG yields improvements on representative multimodal benchmarks, effectively balancing global reasoning and precise local evidence.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 41 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.
Builds on
41 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025To Sink or Not to Sink: Visual Information Pathways in Large Vision-Language Models9 Oct
- 2025See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models5 Mar
Other references · 39
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
27 more
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
- 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 822
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 512
- 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 466
- 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 417
- 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 277
- 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 200
- 2024TinyLLaVA: A Framework of Small-scale Large Multimodal Modelscited by 164
- 2022Linearly Mapping from Image to Text Spacecited by 139
- 2024Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language Modelscited by 115
- 2024Unveiling and Harnessing Hidden Attention Sinks: Enhancing Large Language Models without Training through Attention Calibrationcited by 70
- 2024What's in the Image? A Deep-Dive into the Vision of Vision Language Modelscited by 66
- 2024Spectral Filters, Dark Signals, and Attention Sinkscited by 54
- 2025Vision Transformers Don't Need Trained Registerscited by 39
- 2024Self-Calibrated CLIP for Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 34
- 2025What are you sinking? A geometric approach on attention sinkcited by 26
- 2024The First to Know: How Token Distributions Reveal Hidden Knowledge in Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 24
- 2025KVSink: Understanding and Enhancing the Preservation of Attention Sinks in KV Cache Quantization for LLMscited by 18
- 2024Token Erasure as a Footprint of Implicit Vocabulary Items in LLMscited by 17
- 2025Vision Function Layer in Multimodal LLMscited by 17
- 2025Mirage in the Eyes: Hallucination Attack on Multi-modal Large Language Models with Only Attention Sinkcited by 15
- 2025ZeroTuning: Unlocking the Initial Token's Power to Enhance Large Language Models Without Trainingcited by 11
- 2025Artifacts and Attention Sinks: Structured Approximations for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 9
- 2025Register and [CLS] tokens yield a decoupling of local and global features in large ViTscited by 8
- 2025V-SEAM: Visual Semantic Editing and Attention Modulating for Causal Interpretability of Vision-Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Interpreting Attention Heads for Image-to-Text Information Flow in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention
- 2026On the Nature of Attention Sink that Shapes Decoding Strategy in Omni-LLMs
- 2026Mitigating Mask Prior Drift and Positional Attention Collapse in Large Diffusion Vision-Language Models
- 2026CAPA: Contribution-Aware Pruning and FFN Approximation for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026Attention Sink Forges Native MoE in Attention Layers: Sink-Aware Training to Address Head Collapse
- 2025BlindSight: Harnessing Sparsity for Efficient Vision-Language Models
- 2026Efficient Inference for Large Vision-Language Models: Bottlenecks, Techniques, and Prospects
- 2026Disentangling Semantic Attention from Structural Bias in the Attention Manifold