mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Register and [CLS] tokens yield a decoupling of local and global features in large ViTs

arXiv 2505.05892 ↗First posted 9 May 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work has shown that the attention maps of the widely popular DINOv2 model exhibit artifacts, which hurt both model interpretability and performance on dense image tasks. These artifacts emerge due to the model repurposing patch tokens with redundant local information for the storage of global image information. To address this problem, additional register tokens have been incorporated in which the model can store such information instead. We carefully examine the influence of these register tokens on the relationship between global and local image features, showing that while register tokens yield cleaner attention maps, these maps do not accurately reflect the integration of local image information in large models. Instead, global information is dominated by information extracted from register tokens, leading to a disconnect between local and global features. Inspired by these findings, we show that the [CLS] token itself leads to a very similar phenomenon in models without explicit register tokens. Our work shows that care must be taken when interpreting attention maps of large ViTs. Further, by clearly attributing the faulty behavior to register and [CLS] tokens, we show a path towards more interpretable vision models.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2025.

Builds on

33 of 40 references.

References · 33

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  6. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  7. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  8. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  10. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  11. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  12. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
21 more
  1. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 903
  2. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
  3. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  4. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
  5. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
  6. 2021Extract Free Dense Labels from CLIPcited by 583
  7. 2022Vision Transformer Adapter for Dense Predictionscited by 565
  8. 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 419
  9. 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 282
  10. 2021Localizing Objects with Self-Supervised Transformers and no Labelscited by 230
  11. 2023SCLIP: Rethinking Self-Attention for Dense Vision-Language Inferencecited by 170
  12. 2024Pay Attention to Your Neighbours: Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 77
  13. 2022Teaching Matters: Investigating the Role of Supervision in Vision Transformerscited by 45
  14. 2023The Tunnel Effect: Building Data Representations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 34
  15. 2023Reverse Engineering Self-Supervised Learningcited by 33
  16. 2022ViT-CX: Causal Explanation of Vision Transformerscited by 28
  17. 2023Emergence of Segmentation with Minimalistic White-Box Transformerscited by 24
  18. 2024SINDER: Repairing the Singular Defects of DINOv2cited by 18
  19. 2023Keep It SimPool: Who Said Supervised Transformers Suffer from Attention Deficit?cited by 16
  20. 2024Brain Mapping with Dense Features: Grounding Cortical Semantic Selectivity in Natural Images With Vision Transformerscited by 13
  21. 2023Class-Discriminative Attention Maps for Vision Transformerscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.

9 papers.