mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Crashing Waves vs. Rising Tides: Findings on AI Automation from Thousands of Worker Evaluations of Labor Market Tasks

arXiv 2604.01363 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.AI econ.GN q-fin.ECcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We characterize AI automation as a continuum between crashing waves, in which capabilities jump abruptly across narrow task sets, and rising tides, in which capabilities improve continuously and broadly. Using evidence from more than 6,000 text-based, LLM-addressable tasks derived from the U.S. Department of Labor's O*NET taxonomy and over 60,000 evaluations by experienced workers, we find little evidence of crashing waves (contrary to existing views). Instead, rising tides are the primary form of AI progress. AI performance is high and improving rapidly across many tasks. In 2024-Q2, models completed text-based tasks that take humans about 1.5 hours to complete with roughly 60% success, rising above 70% by 2025-Q3. If recent trends in AI capability growth persist, frontier LLMs will be able to complete most text-based tasks at minimally sufficient quality with 88%-97% success by 2030.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  2. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  3. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  4. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  5. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 523
  6. 2022Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Modelscited by 210
  7. 2020The Computational Limits of Deep Learningcited by 193
  8. 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 175
  9. 2025GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Taskscited by 158
  10. 2025Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Taskscited by 156
  11. 2025Anthropic Economic Index report: Uneven geographic and enterprise AI adoptioncited by 26
  12. 2025HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Taskscited by 24
4 more
  1. 2025Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupationscited by 19
  2. 2025On the Origin of Algorithmic Progress in AIcited by 6
  3. 2026Is there "Secret Sauce'' in Large Language Model Development?cited by 3
  4. 2026Are AI Capabilities Increasing Exponentially? A Competing Hypothesiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.