The Overlooked Repetitive Lengthening Form in Sentiment Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Individuals engaging in online communication frequently express personal opinions with informal styles (e.g., memes and emojis). While Language Models (LMs) with informal communications have been widely discussed, a unique and emphatic style, the Repetitive Lengthening Form (RLF), has been overlooked for years. In this paper, we explore answers to two research questions: 1) Is RLF important for sentiment analysis (SA)? 2) Can LMs understand RLF? Inspired by previous linguistic research, we curate Lengthening, the first multi-domain dataset with 850k samples focused on RLF for SA. Moreover, we introduce Explainable Instruction Tuning (ExpInstruct), a two-stage instruction tuning framework aimed to improve both performance and explainability of LLMs for RLF. We further propose a novel unified approach to quantify LMs' understanding of informal expressions. We show that RLF sentences are expressive expressions and can serve as signatures of document-level sentiment. Additionally, RLF has potential value for online content analysis. Our results show that fine-tuned Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) can surpass zero-shot GPT-4 in performance but not in explanation for RLF. Finally, we show ExpInstruct can improve the open-sourced LLMs to match zero-shot GPT-4 in performance and explainability for RLF with limited samples. Code and sample data are available at https://github.com/Tom-Owl/OverlookedRLF
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.
Builds on
28 of 60 references.
References · 28
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
- 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 397
- 2023Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Checkcited by 268
- 2022Can language models learn from explanations in context?cited by 249
- 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Promptscited by 226
- 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 224
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
16 more
- 2023Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERTcited by 155
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Studycited by 96
- 2023CoEdIT: Text Editing by Task-Specific Instruction Tuningcited by 68
- 2024GOAT-Bench: Safety Insights to Large Multimodal Models through Meme-Based Social Abusecited by 52
- 2023Dynosaur: A Dynamic Growth Paradigm for Instruction-Tuning Data Curationcited by 38
- 2022What do LLMs Know about Financial Markets? A Case Study on Reddit Market Sentiment Analysiscited by 27
- 2022What do you MEME? Generating Explanations for Visual Semantic Role Labelling in Memescited by 18
- 2022Machine Reading, Fast and Slow: When Do Models "Understand" Language?cited by 13
- 2023FLamE: Few-shot Learning from Natural Language Explanationscited by 10
- 2021Structured abbreviation expansion in contextcited by 9
- 2023Automated Few-shot Classification with Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 9
- 2018Multimodal Emoji Predictioncited by 7
- 2023EmojiLM: Modeling the New Emoji Languagecited by 6
- 2017A Deep Neural Architecture for Sentence-level Sentiment Classification in Twitter Social Networkingcited by 2
- 2020Cannot Predict Comment Volume of a News Article before (a few) Users Read Itcited by 2
- 2019Hahahahaha, Duuuuude, Yeeessss!: A two-parameter characterization of stretchable words and the dynamics of mistypings and misspellingscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.