Policy Improvement Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning has become a central post-training paradigm for improving LLM and agent capabilities. Yet existing RL post-training methods share a common blind spot: they construct local learning signals from sampled trajectories, rewards, or feedback-conditioned targets, then update the policy without explicitly verifying whether the resulting policy outperforms its predecessor. Optimizing these local signals does not necessarily produce a better policy, while finite sampling, generation stochasticity and feedback noise can further widen this gap. We argue that the missing ingredient is policy improvement feedback: the ability to measure progress across policy iterations. We introduce Policy Improvement Reinforcement Learning (PIRL), which formulates inter-iteration performance gain as an explicit objective structurally aligned with final task performance. Building on PIRL, we propose Policy Improvement Policy Optimization (PIPO), a plug-in closed-loop framework that verifies the previous update against a sliding-window historical performance anchor. PIPO uses this improvement feedback to modulate the local learning signal of the base policy optimization algorithm, reinforcing updates associated with measured progress and suppressing those associated with performance drops. We provide theoretical evidence that PIPO locally aligns policy updates with the PIRL improvement objective. Experiments on mathematical reasoning, code, tool-use, and self-distillation settings show that PIPO yields consistent gains across PPO, group-relative, and self-distillation policy optimization families.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.
Builds on
64 of 74 references.
References · 64
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
38 more
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
- 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 574
- 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 386
- 2025ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needscited by 342
- 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillationcited by 285
- 2025Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 277
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 267
- 2025MiniMax-M1: Scaling Test-Time Compute Efficiently with Lightning Attentioncited by 248
- 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoningcited by 158
- 2023TACO: Topics in Algorithmic COde generation datasetcited by 150
- 2025Pass@k Training for Adaptively Balancing Exploration and Exploitation of Large Reasoning Modelscited by 134
- 2019Cross-Batch Memory for Embedding Learningcited by 130
- 2025Self-Evolving Curriculum for LLM Reasoningcited by 107
- 2025Geometric-Mean Policy Optimizationcited by 107
- 2025The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origincited by 92
- 2025Segment Policy Optimization: Effective Segment-Level Credit Assignment in RL for Large Language Modelscited by 75
- 2025Beyond Pass@1: Self-Play with Variational Problem Synthesis Sustains RLVRcited by 53
- 2025DCPO: Dynamic Clipping Policy Optimizationcited by 38
- 2026Your Group-Relative Advantage Is Biasedcited by 32
- 2026Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
- 2025On-Policy RL with Optimal Reward Baselinecited by 30
- 2025KL-Regularized Reinforcement Learning is Designed to Mode Collapsecited by 29
- 2026Maximum Likelihood Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2025CDE: Curiosity-Driven Exploration for Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Large Language Modelscited by 28
- 2025Single-stream Policy Optimizationcited by 27
- 2026How Far Can Unsupervised RLVR Scale LLM Training?cited by 26
- 2025Exploration vs Exploitation: Rethinking RLVR through Clipping, Entropy, and Spurious Rewardcited by 25
- 2021Cross-Batch Negative Sampling for Training Two-Tower Recommenderscited by 24
- 2025BroRL: Scaling Reinforcement Learning via Broadened Explorationcited by 23
- 2025Transformer Copilot: Learning from The Mistake Log in LLM Fine-tuningcited by 21
- 2025Decomposing the Entropy-Performance Exchange: The Missing Keys to Unlocking Effective Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2026Experiential Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2025KTAE: A Model-Free Algorithm to Key-Tokens Advantage Estimation in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 19
- 2026Harder Is Better: Boosting Mathematical Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware GRPO and Multi-Aspect Question Reformulationcited by 18
- 2026Does Your Reasoning Model Implicitly Know When to Stop Thinking?cited by 17
- 2025EEPO: Exploration-Enhanced Policy Optimization via Sample-Then-Forgetcited by 14
50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents
- 2026Towards Optimal Policy Improvement
- 2026T2SPO: Trajectory-to-Step Policy Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Where Should RL Post-Training Compute Go? Model Size, Search, Learning, and Feedback
- 2025Policy Gradient Guidance Enables Test Time Control
- 2025Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices
- 2025Diffusion Guidance Is a Controllable Policy Improvement Operator
- 2026Reinforcement Learning with Decomposed Subtasks