mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting Human-in-the-Loop Object Retrieval with Pre-Trained Vision Transformers

arXiv 2604.00809 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.HC cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Building on existing approaches, we revisit Human-in-the-Loop Object Retrieval, a task that consists of iteratively retrieving images containing objects of a class-of-interest, specified by a user-provided query. Starting from a large unlabeled image collection, the aim is to rapidly identify diverse instances of an object category relying solely on the initial query and the user's Relevance Feedback, with no prior labels. The retrieval process is formulated as a binary classification task, where the system continuously learns to distinguish between relevant and non-relevant images to the query, through iterative user interaction. This interaction is guided by an Active Learning loop: at each iteration, the system selects informative samples for user annotation, thereby refining the retrieval performance. This task is particularly challenging in multi-object datasets, where the object of interest may occupy only a small region of the image within a complex, cluttered scene. Unlike object-centered settings where global descriptors often suffice, multi-object images require more adapted, localized descriptors. In this work, we formulate and revisit the Human-in-the-Loop Object Retrieval task by leveraging pre-trained ViT representations, and addressing key design questions, including which object instances to consider in an image, what form the annotations should take, how Active Selection should be applied, and which representation strategies best capture the object's features. We compare several representation strategies across multi-object datasets highlighting trade-offs between capturing the global context and focusing on fine-grained local object details. Our results offer practical insights for the design of effective interactive retrieval pipelines based on Active Learning for object class retrieval.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

19 of 44 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  4. 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 935
  5. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
  6. 2015An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 510
  7. 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
  8. 2015Particular object retrieval with integral max-pooling of CNN activationscited by 160
  9. 2021Training Vision Transformers for Image Retrievalcited by 90
  10. 2021Deep Learning for Instance Retrieval: A Surveycited by 70
  11. 2021Instance-level Image Retrieval using Reranking Transformerscited by 63
  12. 2021DOLG: Single-Stage Image Retrieval with Deep Orthogonal Fusion of Local and Global Featurescited by 54
7 more
  1. 2023Global Features are All You Need for Image Retrieval and Rerankingcited by 41
  2. 2022Boosting vision transformers for image retrievalcited by 19
  3. 2024Revisit Anything: Visual Place Recognition via Image Segment Retrievalcited by 19
  4. 2022DALG: Deep Attentive Local and Global Modeling for Image Retrievalcited by 6
  5. 2024Leveraging Foundation Models for Content-Based Image Retrieval in Radiologycited by 5
  6. 2022Optimizing Active Learning for Low Annotation Budgetscited by 2
  7. 2026Positive-First Most Ambiguous: A Simple Active Learning Criterion for Interactive Retrieval of Rare Categoriescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.