Positive-First Most Ambiguous: A Simple Active Learning Criterion for Interactive Retrieval of Rare Categories
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-world fine-grained visual retrieval often requires discovering a rare concept from large unlabeled collections with minimal supervision. This is especially critical in biodiversity monitoring, ecological studies, and long-tailed visual domains, where the target may represent only a tiny fraction of the data, creating highly imbalanced binary problems. Interactive retrieval with relevance feedback offers a practical solution: starting from a small query, the system selects candidates for binary user annotation and iteratively refines a lightweight classifier. While Active Learning (AL) is commonly used to guide selection, conventional AL assumes symmetric class priors and large annotation budgets, limiting effectiveness in imbalanced, low-budget, low-latency settings. We introduce Positive-First Most Ambiguous (PF-MA), a simple yet effective AL criterion that explicitly addresses the class imbalance asymmetry: it prioritizes near-boundary samples while favoring likely positives, enabling rapid discovery of subtle visual categories while maintaining informativeness. Unlike standard methods that oversample negatives, PF-MA consistently returns small batches with a high proportion of relevant samples, improving early retrieval and user satisfaction. To capture retrieval diversity, we also propose a class coverage metric that measures how well selected positives span the visual variability of the target class. Experiments on long-tailed datasets, including fine-grained botanical data, demonstrate that PF-MA consistently outperforms strong baselines in both coverage and classifier performance, across varying class sizes and descriptors. Our results highlight that aligning AL with the asymmetric and user-centric objectives of interactive fine-grained retrieval enables simple yet powerful solutions for retrieving rare and visually subtle categories in realistic human-in-the-loop settings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2026.
Builds on
20 of 43 references.
References · 20
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
- 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 705
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 538
- 2022The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learningcited by 311
- 2021Towards Open World Object Detectioncited by 297
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Few-shot Learning: Evolution, Applications, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 163
- 2019Discriminative Active Learningcited by 98
- 2021SIMILAR: Submodular Information Measures Based Active Learning In Realistic Scenarioscited by 84
- 2017Object-Part Attention Model for Fine-grained Image Classificationcited by 54
8 more
- 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 54
- 2023Novel Class Discovery: an Introduction and Key Conceptscited by 24
- 2019Deep Learning for Fine-Grained Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 18
- 2021Class-Balanced Active Learning for Image Classificationcited by 15
- 2022Minority Class Oriented Active Learning for Imbalanced Datasetscited by 11
- 2018Information-Theoretic Active Learning for Content-Based Image Retrievalcited by 5
- 2024Active Learning via Classifier Impact and Greedy Selection for Interactive Image Retrievalcited by 5
- 2022Optimizing Active Learning for Low Annotation Budgetscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.