mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CivicShield: A Cross-Domain Defense-in-Depth Framework for Securing Government-Facing AI Chatbots Against Multi-Turn Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 2603.29062 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based chatbots in government services face critical security gaps. Multi-turn adversarial attacks achieve over 90% success against current defenses, and single-layer guardrails are bypassed with similar rates. We present CivicShield, a cross-domain defense-in-depth framework for government-facing AI chatbots. Drawing on network security, formal verification, biological immune systems, aviation safety, and zero-trust cryptography, CivicShield introduces seven defense layers: (1) zero-trust foundation with capability-based access control, (2) perimeter input validation, (3) semantic firewall with intent classification, (4) conversation state machine with safety invariants, (5) behavioral anomaly detection, (6) multi-model consensus verification, and (7) graduated human-in-the-loop escalation. We present a formal threat model covering 8 multi-turn attack families, map the framework to NIST SP 800-53 controls across 14 families, and evaluate using ablation analysis. Theoretical analysis shows layered defenses reduce attack probability by 1-2 orders of magnitude versus single-layer approaches. Simulation against 1,436 scenarios including HarmBench (416), JailbreakBench (200), and XSTest (450) achieves 72.9% combined detection [69.5-76.0% CI] with 2.9% effective false positive rate after graduated response, while maintaining 100% detection of multi-turn crescendo and slow-drift attacks. The honest drop on real benchmarks versus author-generated scenarios (71.2% vs 76.7% on HarmBench, 47.0% vs 70.0% on JailbreakBench) validates independent evaluation importance. CivicShield addresses an open gap at the intersection of AI safety, government compliance, and practical deployment.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 11 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

Builds on

11 of 76 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025LlamaFirewall: An open source guardrail system for building secure AI agents6 May
  2. 2024StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries9 Feb
  3. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal6 Feb
  4. 2023Tensor Trust: Interpretable Prompt Injection Attacks from an Online Game2 Nov

Other references · 7

  1. 2024TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Modelcited by 618
  2. 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 322
  3. 2025Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against Universal Jailbreaks across Thousands of Hours of Red Teamingcited by 181
  4. 2025The Attacker Moves Second: Stronger Adaptive Attacks Bypass Defenses Against Llm Jailbreaks and Prompt Injectionscited by 129
  5. 2024BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Modelscited by 86
  6. 2025VeriGuard: Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Verified Code Generationcited by 49
  7. 2026TRYLOCK: Defense-in-Depth Against LLM Jailbreaks via Layered Preference and Representation Engineeringcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Echo Chamber Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak
  2. 2026SEMA: Simple yet Effective Learning for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks
  3. 2025ASTRA: Agentic Steerability and Risk Assessment Framework
  4. 2026Toward Secure AI-Powered Penetration Testing Agents: Security Threats, Guardrails, and Architectural Perspectives
  5. 2026MultiTurnPSB: Evaluating Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks an dClassifier-Based Defenses for Medical AI Safety
  6. 2025"I know it's not right, but that's what it said to do": Investigating Trust in AI Chatbots for Cybersecurity Policy
  7. 2025Trust in LLM-controlled Robotics: a Survey of Security Threats, Defenses and Challenges
  8. 2026A Formal Security Framework for MCP-Based AI Agents: Threat Taxonomy, Verification Models, and Defense Mechanisms