Spectral Edge Dynamics: An Analytical-Empirical Study of Phase Transitions in Neural Network Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop the spectral edge analysis: phase transitions in neural network training -- grokking, capability gains, loss plateaus -- are controlled by the spectral gap of the rolling-window Gram matrix of parameter updates. In the extreme aspect ratio regime (parameters P ~ 108, window W ~ 10), the classical BBP detection threshold is vacuous; the operative structure is the intra-signal gap separating dominant from subdominant modes at position k^* = argmax, σj/σj+1. From three assumptions we derive: (i) gap dynamics governed by a Dyson-type ODE with curvature asymmetry, damping, and gradient driving; (ii) a spectral loss decomposition linking each mode's learning contribution to its Davis--Kahan stability coefficient; (iii) the Gap Maximality Principle, showing that k^* is the unique dynamically privileged position -- its collapse is the only one that disrupts learning, and it sustains itself through an α-feedback loop requiring no assumption on the optimizer. The adiabatic parameter A = |Delta G|F / (η, g2) controls circuit stability: A ll 1 (plateau), A ~ 1 (phase transition), A gg 1 (forgetting). Tested across six model families (150K--124M parameters): gap dynamics precede every grokking event (24/24 with weight decay, 1/24 without), the gap position is optimizer-dependent (Muon: k^*=1, AdamW: k^*=2 on the same model), and 19/20 quantitative predictions are confirmed. The framework is consistent with the edge of stability, Tensor Programs, Dyson Brownian motion, the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis, and neural scaling laws.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.
Builds on
12 of 38 references.
References · 12
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 363
- 2017Empirical Analysis of the Hessian of Over-Parametrized Neural Networkscited by 290
- 2018Gradient Descent Happens in a Tiny Subspacecited by 217
- 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 143
- 2026Low-Dimensional and Transversely Curved Optimization Dynamics in Grokkingcited by 11
- 2026The Geometry of Multi-Task Grokking: Transverse Instability, Superposition, and Weight Decay Phase Structurecited by 9
- 2026Early-Warning Signals of Grokking via Loss-Landscape Geometrycited by 7
- 2026Spectral Edge Dynamics of Training Trajectories: Signal--Noise Geometry Across Scalescited by 6
- 2026Optimizer-Induced Low-Dimensional Drift and Transverse Dynamics in Transformer Trainingcited by 4
- 2026Global Low-Rank, Local Full-Rank: The Holographic Encoding of Learned Algorithmscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Spectral Edge Dynamics Reveal Functional Modes of Learningcited by 2
- 2026Weight Decay Regimes in Grokking Transformers: Cheap Online Diagnosticscited by 2
- 2026The Lifecycle of the Spectral Edge: From Gradient Learning to Weight-Decay Compressioncited by 1
- 2026Gradient-Direction Sensitivity Reveals Linear-Centroid Coupling Hidden by Optimizer Trajectoriescited by 1
- 2026Weight Decay Regimes in Grokking Transformers: Cheap Online Diagnostics19 May 2026
- 2026Gradient-Direction Sensitivity Reveals Linear-Centroid Coupling Hidden by Optimizer Trajectories28 Apr 2026
- 2026The Lifecycle of the Spectral Edge: From Gradient Learning to Weight-Decay Compression8 Apr 2026
- 2026Spectral Edge Dynamics Reveal Functional Modes of Learning6 Apr 2026