Spectral Edge Dynamics Reveal Functional Modes of Learning
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Circuits and mechanistic analysis
Abstract (arXiv)
Training dynamics during grokking concentrate along a small number of dominant update directions -- the spectral edge -- which reliably distinguishes grokking from non-grokking regimes. We show that standard mechanistic interpretability tools (head attribution, activation probing, sparse autoencoders) fail to capture these directions: their structure is not localized in parameter or feature space. Instead, each direction induces a structured function over the input domain, revealing low-dimensional functional modes invisible to representation-level analysis. For modular addition, all leading directions collapse to a single Fourier mode. For multiplication, the same collapse appears only in the discrete-log basis, yielding a 5.9x improvement in concentration. For subtraction, the edge spans a small multi-mode family. For x2+y2, no single harmonic basis suffices, but cross-terms of additive and multiplicative features provide a 4x variance boost, consistent with the decomposition (a+b)2 - 2ab. Multitask training amplifies this compositional structure, with the x2+y2 spectral edge inheriting the addition circuit's characteristic frequency (2.3x concentration increase). These results suggest that training discovers low-dimensional functional modes over the input domain, whose structure depends on the algebraic symmetry of the task. These results suggest that spectral edge dynamics identify low-dimensional functional subspaces governing learning, whose representation depends on the algebraic structure of the task. Simple harmonic structure emerges only when the task admits a symmetry-adapted basis; more complex tasks require richer functional descriptions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.
Builds on
11 of 19 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023A Toy Model of Universality: Reverse Engineering How Networks Learn Group Operations6 Feb
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretability12 Jan
Other references · 9
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 370
- 2023The Clock and the Pizza: Two Stories in Mechanistic Explanation of Neural Networkscited by 156
- 2023Grokking Group Multiplication with Cosetscited by 24
- 2026Low-Dimensional and Transversely Curved Optimization Dynamics in Grokkingcited by 11
- 2026The Geometry of Multi-Task Grokking: Transverse Instability, Superposition, and Weight Decay Phase Structurecited by 9
- 2026Spectral Edge Dynamics: An Analytical-Empirical Study of Phase Transitions in Neural Network Trainingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026The Geometric Inductive Bias of Grokking: Bypassing Phase Transitions via Architectural Topology
- 2026Intrinsic Structure: Spectral Identifiability for Mechanistic Interpretability
- 2026Spectral phase transitions and trainability in neural network learning dynamics
- 2026Structure and Redundancy in Large Language Models: A Spectral Study via Random Matrix Theory
- 2025Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training
- 2024Collective variables of neural networks: empirical time evolution and scaling laws
- 2026First Learn, Then Memorize: The Spectral Bias of Diffusion Models
- 2026Grokking of Diffusion Models: Case Study on Modular Addition