mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Global Low-Rank, Local Full-Rank: The Holographic Encoding of Learned Algorithms

arXiv 2602.18649 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Grokking -- the abrupt transition from memorization to generalization after extended training -- has been linked to the emergence of low-dimensional structure in learning dynamics. Yet neural network parameters inhabit extremely high-dimensional spaces. How can a low-dimensional learning process produce solutions that resist low-dimensional compression? We investigate this question in multi-task modular arithmetic, training shared-trunk Transformers with separate heads for addition, multiplication, and a quadratic operation modulo 97. Across three model scales (315K--2.2M parameters) and five weight decay settings, we compare three reconstruction methods: per-matrix SVD, joint cross-matrix SVD, and trajectory PCA. Across all conditions, grokking trajectories are confined to a 2--6 dimensional global subspace, while individual weight matrices remain effectively full-rank. Reconstruction from 3--5 trajectory PCs recovers over 95% of final accuracy, whereas both per-matrix and joint SVD fail at sub-full rank. Even when static decompositions capture most spectral energy, they destroy task-relevant structure. These results show that learned algorithms are encoded through dynamically coordinated updates spanning all matrices, rather than localized low-rank components. We term this the holographic encoding principle: grokked solutions are globally low-rank in the space of learning directions but locally full-rank in parameter space, with implications for compression, interpretability, and understanding how neural networks encode computation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.

Builds on

14 of 16 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  3. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
  4. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 599
  5. 2023The Clock and the Pizza: Two Stories in Mechanistic Explanation of Neural Networkscited by 153
  6. 2022Omnigrok: Grokking Beyond Algorithmic Datacited by 142
  7. 2023Explaining grokking through circuit efficiencycited by 105
  8. 2023A Tale of Two Circuits: Grokking as Competition of Sparse and Dense Subnetworkscited by 78
  9. 2023Dichotomy of Early and Late Phase Implicit Biases Can Provably Induce Grokkingcited by 76
  10. 2023Unifying Grokking and Double Descentcited by 49
  11. 2026Low-Dimensional and Transversely Curved Optimization Dynamics in Grokkingcited by 10
  12. 2026The Geometry of Multi-Task Grokking: Transverse Instability, Superposition, and Weight Decay Phase Structurecited by 8
2 more
  1. 2026Low-Dimensional Execution Manifolds in Transformer Learning Dynamics: Evidence from Modular Arithmetic Taskscited by 7
  2. 2026Early-Warning Signals of Grokking via Loss-Landscape Geometrycited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.