SkyNet: Belief-Aware Planning for Partially-Observable Stochastic Games
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In 2019, Google DeepMind released MuZero, a model-based reinforcement learning method that achieves strong results in perfect-information games by combining learned dynamics models with Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). However, comparatively little work has extended MuZero to partially observable, stochastic, multi-player environments, where agents must act under uncertainty about hidden state. Such settings arise not only in card games but in domains such as autonomous negotiation, financial trading, and multi-agent robotics. In the absence of explicit belief modeling, MuZero's latent encoding has no dedicated mechanism for representing uncertainty over unobserved variables. To address this, we introduce SkyNet (Belief-Aware MuZero), which adds ego-conditioned auxiliary heads for winner prediction and rank estimation to the standard MuZero architecture. These objectives encourage the latent state to retain information predictive of outcomes under partial observability, without requiring explicit belief-state tracking or changes to the search algorithm. We evaluate SkyNet on Skyjo, a partially observable, non-zero-sum, stochastic card game, using a decision-granularity environment, transformer-based encoding, and a curriculum of heuristic opponents with self-play. In 1000-game head-to-head evaluations at matched checkpoints, SkyNet achieves a 75.3% peak win rate against the baseline (+194 Elo, p < 10-50). SkyNet also outperforms the baseline against heuristic opponents (0.720 vs. 0.466 win rate). Critically, the belief-aware model initially underperforms the baseline but decisively surpasses it once training throughput is sufficient, suggesting that belief-aware auxiliary supervision improves learned representations under partial observability, but only given adequate data flow.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2026.
Builds on
14 of 29 references.
References · 14
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
- 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
- 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 400
- 2020Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive Representationscited by 309
- 2018Distributed Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 260
- 2021Mastering Atari Games with Limited Datacited by 235
- 2017DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Pokercited by 228
- 2019OpenSpiel: A Framework for Reinforcement Learning in Gamescited by 180
- 2020Combining Deep Reinforcement Learning and Search for Imperfect-Information Gamescited by 110
- 2021Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 90
- 2020The Value Equivalence Principle for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 88
- 2021Learning and Planning in Complex Action Spacescited by 76
Built on by
Not cited yet.