Over-Refusal and Representation Subspaces: A Mechanistic Analysis of Task-Conditioned Refusal in Aligned LLMs
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Aligned language models that are trained to refuse harmful requests also exhibit over-refusal: they decline safe instructions that seemingly resemble harmful instructions. A natural approach is to ablate the global refusal direction, steering the hidden-state vectors away or towards the harmful-refusal examples, but this corrects over-refusal only incidentally while disrupting the broader refusal mechanism. In this work, we analyse the representational geometry of both refusal types to understand why this happens. We show that harmful-refusal directions are task-agnostic and can be captured by a single global vector, whereas over-refusal directions are task-dependent: they reside within the benign task-representation clusters, vary across tasks, and span a higher-dimensional subspace. Linear probing suggests that the two refusal types are representationally distinct from the early transformer layers. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation of why global direction ablation alone cannot address over-refusal, and establish that task-specific geometric interventions are necessary.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 27 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2026.
Builds on
27 of 59 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Refusal Falls off a Cliff: How Safety Alignment Fails in Reasoning?7 Oct
- 2025Just Enough Shifts: Mitigating Over-Refusal in Aligned Language Models with Targeted Representation Fine-Tuning6 Jul
- 2025Understanding Refusal in Language Models with Sparse Autoencoders29 May
- 2025FalseReject: A Resource for Improving Contextual Safety and Mitigating Over-Refusals in LLMs via Structured Reasoning12 May
- 2025The Geometry of Refusal in Large Language Models: Concept Cones and Representational Independence24 Feb
- 2024POROver: Improving Safety and Reducing Overrefusal in Large Language Models with Overgeneration and Preference Optimization16 Oct
Other references · 21
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 712
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
- 2023Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discoverycited by 209
- 2024Improving Instruction-Following in Language Models through Activation Steeringcited by 160
- 2025LLMs Encode Harmfulness and Refusal Separatelycited by 88
- 2024Adaptive Activation Steering: A Tuning-Free LLM Truthfulness Improvement Method for Diverse Hallucinations Categoriescited by 77
9 more
- 2024On the Role of Attention Heads in Large Language Model Safetycited by 72
- 2024Surgical, Cheap, and Flexible: Mitigating False Refusal in Language Models via Single Vector Ablationcited by 48
- 2025Understanding (Un)Reliability of Steering Vectors in Language Modelscited by 47
- 2025Refusal Direction is Universal Across Safety-Aligned Languagescited by 38
- 2024Whispering Experts: Neural Interventions for Toxicity Mitigation in Language Modelscited by 32
- 2025SafeSwitch: Steering Unsafe LLM Behavior via Internal Activation Signalscited by 29
- 2025To Steer or Not to Steer? Mechanistic Error Reduction with Abstention for Language Modelscited by 29
- 2023Uncovering Intermediate Variables in Transformers using Circuit Probingcited by 12
- 2025Should LLM Safety Be More Than Refusing Harmful Instructions?cited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026There Is More to Refusal in Large Language Models than a Single Direction
- 2026Refusal geometry reflects refusal training: diverse refusal prefixes can raise stable rank and weaken refusal vector ablation attacks
- 2025SafeConstellations: Mitigating Over-Refusals in LLMs Through Task-Aware Representation Steering
- 2026Latent-space Attacks for Refusal Evasion in Language Models
- 2025SOM Directions are Better than One: Multi-Directional Refusal Suppression in Language Models
- 2026The Geometry of Refusal: Linear Instability in Safety-Aligned LLMs
- 2026Universal Refusal Circuits Across LLMs: Cross-Model Transfer via Trajectory Replay and Concept-Basis Reconstruction
- 2025Beyond I'm Sorry, I Can't: Dissecting Large Language Model Refusal