mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Operationalizing Perceptions of Agent Gender: Foundations and Guidelines

arXiv 2603.26682 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.HC cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

The "gender" of intelligent agents, virtual characters, social robots, and other agentic machines has emerged as a fundamental topic in studies of people's interactions with computers. Perceptions of agent gender can help explain user attitudes and behaviours -- from preferences to toxicity to stereotyping -- across a variety of systems and contexts of use. Yet, standards in capturing perceptions of agent gender do not exist. A scoping review was conducted to clarify how agent gender has been operationalized -- labelled, defined, and measured -- as a perceptual variable. One-third of studies manipulated but did not measure agent gender. Norms in operationalizations remain obscure, limiting comprehension of results, congruity in measurement, and comparability for meta-analyses. The dominance of the gender binary model and latent anthropocentrism have placed arbitrary limits on knowledge generation and reified the status quo. We contribute a systematically-developed and theory-driven meta-level framework that offers operational clarity and practical guidance for greater rigour and inclusivity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 176 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

13 of 176 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language Technologiescited by 128
  2. 2023Nonverbal Cues in Human-Robot Interaction: A Communication Studies Perspectivecited by 16
  3. 2022What Pronouns for Pepper? A Critical Review of Gender/ing in Researchcited by 9
  4. 2023Not Only WEIRD but "Uncanny"? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human-Robot Interaction Researchcited by 8
  5. 2022Using Design Metaphors to Understand User Expectations of Socially Interactive Robot Embodimentscited by 6
  6. 2024Silver-Tongued and Sundry: Exploring Intersectional Pronouns with ChatGPTcited by 6
  7. 2022Neither "Hear" Nor "Their": Interrogating Gender Neutrality in Robotscited by 5
  8. 2022Exploring Gender-Expansive Categorization Options for Robotscited by 5
  9. 2022Robot's Gendering Trouble: A Scoping Review of Gendering Humanoid Robots and its Effects on HRIcited by 5
  10. 2023Transcending the "Male Code": Implicit Masculine Biases in NLP Contextscited by 5
  11. 2023Can Voice Assistants Sound Cute? Towards a Model of Kawaii Vocalicscited by 4
  12. 2025Social Identity in Human-Agent Interaction: A Primercited by 3
1 more
  1. 2025Inter(sectional) Alia(s): Ambiguity in Voice Agent Identity via Intersectional Japanese Self-Referentscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Observable Social Life Spaces: Exploring User Interpretations of agent-side life context in human-agent interaction ↗
  2. 2026ExpressionCueLens: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Human-AI Companion Conversations on Social Media ↗
  3. 2025The Quasi-Creature and the Uncanny Valley of Agency: A Synthesis of Theory and Evidence on User Interaction with Inconsistent Generative AI
  4. 2024"My Kind of Woman": Analysing Gender Stereotypes in AI through The Averageness Theory and EU Law
  5. 2026Narrative Sharpens Gender Gaps: Surveying Film Characters with LLM Agents
  6. 2025When Trust Collides: Decoding Human-LLM Cooperation Dynamics through the Prisoner's Dilemma
  7. 2026How Agents Represent Humans: Human-Directed Stereotypes in an Open Agent Social Network
  8. 2026How do LLMs Evaluate Perceived Moral Agency? Investigating Moral Decision-Making in Human-Artificial Agents Interactions