mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Social Identity in Human-Agent Interaction: A Primer

arXiv 2508.16609 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2025physics.soc-ph cs.AI cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social identity theory (SIT) and social categorization theory (SCT) are two facets of the social identity approach (SIA) to understanding social phenomena. SIT and SCT are models that describe and explain how people interact with one another socially, connecting the individual to the group through an understanding of underlying psychological mechanisms and intergroup behaviour. SIT, originally developed in the 1970s, and SCT, a later, more general offshoot, have been broadly applied to a range of social phenomena among people. The rise of increasingly social machines embedded in daily life has spurned efforts on understanding whether and how artificial agents can and do participate in SIA activities. As agents like social robots and chatbots powered by sophisticated large language models (LLMs) advance, understanding the real and potential roles of these technologies as social entities is crucial. Here, I provide a primer on SIA and extrapolate, through case studies and imagined examples, how SIT and SCT can apply to artificial social agents. I emphasize that not all human models and sub-theories will apply. I further argue that, given the emerging competence of these machines and our tendency to be taken in by them, we experts may need to don the hat of the uncanny killjoy, for our own good.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 149 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2025.

Builds on

14 of 149 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  2. 2014The Rise of Social Botscited by 96
  3. 2018Analyzing the Digital Traces of Political Manipulation: The 2016 Russian Interference Twitter Campaigncited by 30
  4. 2023Nonverbal Cues in Human-Robot Interaction: A Communication Studies Perspectivecited by 16
  5. 2022What Pronouns for Pepper? A Critical Review of Gender/ing in Researchcited by 9
  6. 2023Not Only WEIRD but "Uncanny"? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human-Robot Interaction Researchcited by 8
  7. 2024Silver-Tongued and Sundry: Exploring Intersectional Pronouns with ChatGPTcited by 6
  8. 2022Neither "Hear" Nor "Their": Interrogating Gender Neutrality in Robotscited by 5
  9. 2022Robot's Gendering Trouble: A Scoping Review of Gendering Humanoid Robots and its Effects on HRIcited by 5
  10. 2022Voice Over Body? Older Adults' Reactions to Robot and Voice Assistant Facilitators of Group Conversationcited by 4
  11. 2021Crossing the Tepper Line: An Emerging Ontology for Describing the Dynamic Sociality of Embodied AIcited by 3
  12. 2024Coimagining the Future of Voice Assistants with Cultural Sensitivitycited by 3
2 more
  1. 2024From "Made In" to Mukokuseki: Exploring the Visual Perception of National Identity in Robotscited by 1
  2. 2024Bots against Bias: Critical Next Steps for Human-Robot Interactioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Towards Social AI: A Survey on Understanding Social Interactions
  2. 2023The SocialAI School: Insights from Developmental Psychology Towards Artificial Socio-Cultural Agents
  3. 2025Social World Models
  4. 2025Social Human Robot Embodied Conversation (SHREC) Dataset: Benchmarking Foundational Models' Social Reasoning
  5. 2026Behavioral Determinants of Deployed AI Agents in Social Networks: A Multi-Factor Study of Personality, Model, and Guardrail Specification
  6. 2026Socially Grounded Agentic AI: Coordinating Plural Perspectives through Social Theory
  7. 2024Language Models Represent Beliefs of Self and Others
  8. 2026Socially fluent AI decouples conversational signals from source identity in online interaction