mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Debiased Recommendation with Noisy Feedback

arXiv 2406.17182 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2024cs.IR cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ratings of a user to most items in recommender systems are usually missing not at random (MNAR), largely because users are free to choose which items to rate. To achieve unbiased learning of the prediction model under MNAR data, three typical solutions have been proposed, including error-imputation-based (EIB), inverse-propensity-scoring (IPS), and doubly robust (DR) methods. However, these methods ignore an alternative form of bias caused by the inconsistency between the observed ratings and the users' true preferences, also known as noisy feedback or outcome measurement errors (OME), e.g., due to public opinion or low-quality data collection process. In this work, we study intersectional threats to the unbiased learning of the prediction model from data MNAR and OME in the collected data. First, we design OME-EIB, OME-IPS, and OME-DR estimators, which largely extend the existing estimators to combat OME in real-world recommendation scenarios. Next, we theoretically prove the unbiasedness and generalization bound of the proposed estimators. We further propose an alternate denoising training approach to achieve unbiased learning of the prediction model under MNAR data with OME. Extensive experiments are conducted on three real-world datasets and one semi-synthetic dataset to show the effectiveness of our proposed approaches. The code is available at https://github.com/haoxuanli-pku/KDD24-OME-DR.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.

Builds on

37 of 84 references.

References · 37

  1. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  2. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  3. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
  4. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  5. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  6. 2018Entire Space Multi-Task Model: An Effective Approach for Estimating Post-Click Conversion Ratecited by 173
  7. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  8. 2021Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 116
  9. 2022KuaiRec: A Fully-observed Dataset and Insights for Evaluating Recommender Systemscited by 96
  10. 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
  11. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  12. 2020Denoising Implicit Feedback for Recommendationcited by 80
25 more
  1. 2017Causal Embeddings for Recommendationcited by 79
  2. 2019Unbiased Recommender Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Implicit Feedbackcited by 79
  3. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 68
  4. 2021AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendationcited by 68
  5. 2022ESCM2: Entire Space Counterfactual Multi-Task Model for Post-Click Conversion Rate Estimationcited by 47
  6. 2019Large-scale Causal Approaches to Debiasing Post-click Conversion Rate Estimation with Multi-task Learningcited by 39
  7. 2020Information Theoretic Counterfactual Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Feedbackcited by 30
  8. 2020Unbiased Risk Estimators Can Mislead: A Case Study of Learning with Complementary Labelscited by 29
  9. 2019Asymmetric Tri-training for Debiasing Missing-Not-At-Random Explicit Feedbackcited by 28
  10. 2021Enhanced Doubly Robust Learning for Debiasing Post-click Conversion Rate Estimationcited by 28
  11. 2022Self-Guided Learning to Denoise for Robust Recommendationcited by 24
  12. 2022StableDR: Stabilized Doubly Robust Learning for Recommendation on Data Missing Not at Randomcited by 24
  13. 2018Deep reinforcement learning for search, recommendation, and online advertising: a surveycited by 23
  14. 2021Top-N Recommendation with Counterfactual User Preference Simulationcited by 21
  15. 2021Concept-Aware Denoising Graph Neural Network for Micro-Video Recommendationcited by 18
  16. 2022TDR-CL: Targeted Doubly Robust Collaborative Learning for Debiased Recommendationscited by 18
  17. 2022Doubly-Robust Estimation for Correcting Position-Bias in Click Feedback for Unbiased Learning to Rankcited by 18
  18. 2023Denoising and Prompt-Tuning for Multi-Behavior Recommendationcited by 18
  19. 2023Balancing Unobserved Confounding with a Few Unbiased Ratings in Debiased Recommendationscited by 18
  20. 2022Reaching the End of Unbiasedness: Uncovering Implicit Limitations of Click-Based Learning to Rankcited by 10
  21. 2024Doubly Calibrated Estimator for Recommendation on Data Missing Not At Randomcited by 7
  22. 2019Towards Resolving Propensity Contradiction in Offline Recommender Learningcited by 6
  23. 2024Debiased Collaborative Filtering with Kernel-Based Causal Balancingcited by 6
  24. 2024CounterCLR: Counterfactual Contrastive Learning with Non-random Missing Data in Recommendationcited by 5
  25. 2023CDR: Conservative Doubly Robust Learning for Debiased Recommendationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.