mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MuQ-Eval: An Open-Source Per-Sample Quality Metric for AI Music Generation Evaluation

arXiv 2603.22677 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.SDcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distributional metrics such as Fr'echet Audio Distance cannot score individual music clips and correlate poorly with human judgments, while the only per-sample learned metric achieving high human correlation is closed-source. We introduce MUQ-EVAL, an open-source per-sample quality metric for AIgenerated music built by training lightweight prediction heads on frozen MuQ-310M features using MusicEval, a dataset of generated clips from 31 text-to-music systems with expert quality ratings. Our simplest model, frozen features with attention pooling and a two-layer MLP, achieves system-level SRCC = 0.957 and utterance-level SRCC = 0.838 with human mean opinion scores. A systematic ablation over training objectives and adaptation strategies shows that no addition meaningfully improves the frozen baseline, indicating that frozen MuQ representations already capture quality-relevant information. Encoder choice is the dominant design factor, outweighing all architectural and training decisions. LoRA-adapted models trained on as few as 150 clips already achieve usable correlation, enabling personalized quality evaluators from individual listener annotations. A controlled degradation analysis reveals selective sensitivity to signal-level artifacts but insensitivity to musical-structural distortions. Our metric, MUQ-EVAL, is fully open-source, outperforms existing open per-sample metrics, and runs in real time on a single consumer GPU. Code, model weights, and evaluation scripts are available at https://github.com/dgtql/MuQ-Eval.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.

Builds on

26 of 28 references.

References · 26

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  3. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
  4. 2022Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentationcited by 707
  5. 2023Simple and Controllable Music Generationcited by 480
  6. 2023MusicLM: Generating Music From Textcited by 442
  7. 2018Fr'echet Audio Distance: A Metric for Evaluating Music Enhancement Algorithmscited by 221
  8. 2024Stable Audio Opencited by 192
  9. 2021NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasetscited by 189
  10. 2023MERT: Acoustic Music Understanding Model with Large-Scale Self-supervised Trainingcited by 175
  11. 2021DNSMOS P.835: A Non-Intrusive Perceptual Objective Speech Quality Metric to Evaluate Noise Suppressorscited by 165
  12. 2025Meta Audiobox Aesthetics: Unified Automatic Quality Assessment for Speech, Music, and Soundcited by 129
14 more
  1. 2023Adapting Frechet Audio Distance for Generative Music Evaluationcited by 92
  2. 2025MuQ: Self-Supervised Music Representation Learning with Mel Residual Vector Quantizationcited by 66
  3. 2025Audio Large Language Models Can Be Descriptive Speech Quality Evaluatorscited by 25
  4. 2025KAD: No More FAD! An Effective and Efficient Evaluation Metric for Audio Generationcited by 24
  5. 2025SongEval: A Benchmark Dataset for Song Aesthetics Evaluationcited by 24
  6. 2024SCOREQ: Speech Quality Assessment with Contrastive Regressioncited by 23
  7. 2024PAM: Prompting Audio-Language Models for Audio Quality Assessmentcited by 20
  8. 2025Aligning Text-to-Music Evaluation with Human Preferencescited by 20
  9. 2025MusicEval: A Generative Music Dataset with Expert Ratings for Automatic Text-to-Music Evaluationcited by 17
  10. 2025Benchmarking Music Generation Models and Metrics via Human Preference Studiescited by 15
  11. 2025The AudioMOS Challenge 2025cited by 8
  12. 2025A Survey on Evaluation Metrics for Music Generationcited by 6
  13. 2025Human-CLAP: Human-perception-based contrastive language-audio pretrainingcited by 4
  14. 2025From Aesthetics to Human Preferences: Comparative Perspectives of Evaluating Text-to-Music Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.