MuQ-Eval: An Open-Source Per-Sample Quality Metric for AI Music Generation Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Distributional metrics such as Fr'echet Audio Distance cannot score individual music clips and correlate poorly with human judgments, while the only per-sample learned metric achieving high human correlation is closed-source. We introduce MUQ-EVAL, an open-source per-sample quality metric for AIgenerated music built by training lightweight prediction heads on frozen MuQ-310M features using MusicEval, a dataset of generated clips from 31 text-to-music systems with expert quality ratings. Our simplest model, frozen features with attention pooling and a two-layer MLP, achieves system-level SRCC = 0.957 and utterance-level SRCC = 0.838 with human mean opinion scores. A systematic ablation over training objectives and adaptation strategies shows that no addition meaningfully improves the frozen baseline, indicating that frozen MuQ representations already capture quality-relevant information. Encoder choice is the dominant design factor, outweighing all architectural and training decisions. LoRA-adapted models trained on as few as 150 clips already achieve usable correlation, enabling personalized quality evaluators from individual listener annotations. A controlled degradation analysis reveals selective sensitivity to signal-level artifacts but insensitivity to musical-structural distortions. Our metric, MUQ-EVAL, is fully open-source, outperforms existing open per-sample metrics, and runs in real time on a single consumer GPU. Code, model weights, and evaluation scripts are available at https://github.com/dgtql/MuQ-Eval.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.
Builds on
26 of 28 references.
References · 26
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
- 2022Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentationcited by 707
- 2023Simple and Controllable Music Generationcited by 480
- 2023MusicLM: Generating Music From Textcited by 442
- 2018Fr'echet Audio Distance: A Metric for Evaluating Music Enhancement Algorithmscited by 221
- 2024Stable Audio Opencited by 192
- 2021NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasetscited by 189
- 2023MERT: Acoustic Music Understanding Model with Large-Scale Self-supervised Trainingcited by 175
- 2021DNSMOS P.835: A Non-Intrusive Perceptual Objective Speech Quality Metric to Evaluate Noise Suppressorscited by 165
- 2025Meta Audiobox Aesthetics: Unified Automatic Quality Assessment for Speech, Music, and Soundcited by 129
14 more
- 2023Adapting Frechet Audio Distance for Generative Music Evaluationcited by 92
- 2025MuQ: Self-Supervised Music Representation Learning with Mel Residual Vector Quantizationcited by 66
- 2025Audio Large Language Models Can Be Descriptive Speech Quality Evaluatorscited by 25
- 2025KAD: No More FAD! An Effective and Efficient Evaluation Metric for Audio Generationcited by 24
- 2025SongEval: A Benchmark Dataset for Song Aesthetics Evaluationcited by 24
- 2024SCOREQ: Speech Quality Assessment with Contrastive Regressioncited by 23
- 2024PAM: Prompting Audio-Language Models for Audio Quality Assessmentcited by 20
- 2025Aligning Text-to-Music Evaluation with Human Preferencescited by 20
- 2025MusicEval: A Generative Music Dataset with Expert Ratings for Automatic Text-to-Music Evaluationcited by 17
- 2025Benchmarking Music Generation Models and Metrics via Human Preference Studiescited by 15
- 2025The AudioMOS Challenge 2025cited by 8
- 2025A Survey on Evaluation Metrics for Music Generationcited by 6
- 2025Human-CLAP: Human-perception-based contrastive language-audio pretrainingcited by 4
- 2025From Aesthetics to Human Preferences: Comparative Perspectives of Evaluating Text-to-Music Systemscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026TuneJury: An Open Metric for Improving Music Generation Preference Alignmentcited by 3
- 2026SAME: A Semantically-Aligned Music Autoencodercited by 2
- 2026APEX: Large-scale Multi-task Aesthetic-Informed Popularity Prediction for AI-Generated Musiccited by 0
- 2026TTM-Bench: A Framework for Text-to-Music System Performance Benchmarkingcited by 0
- 2026Synthesis and editing of multi-instrument audio mixtures using scalar-quantised latents with MIDI Span conditioningcited by 0
- 2026MIRA: A Musical Intent Refinement Agent for Aligning Text-to-Music Generation with User Intentcited by 0
- 2026MIRA: A Musical Intent Refinement Agent for Aligning Text-to-Music Generation with User Intent7 Oct 2026
- 2026Synthesis and editing of multi-instrument audio mixtures using scalar-quantised latents with MIDI Span conditioning22 Sep 2026
- 2026TTM-Bench: A Framework for Text-to-Music System Performance Benchmarking16 Sep 2026
- 2026TuneJury: An Open Metric for Improving Music Generation Preference Alignment15 Jun 2026
- 2026SAME: A Semantically-Aligned Music Autoencoder18 May 2026
- 2026APEX: Large-scale Multi-task Aesthetic-Informed Popularity Prediction for AI-Generated Music5 May 2026