mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SafePilot: A Framework for Assuring LLM-enabled Cyber-Physical Systems

arXiv 2603.21523 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs), deep learning architectures with typically over 10 billion parameters, have recently begun to be integrated into various cyber-physical systems (CPS) such as robotics, industrial automation, and autopilot systems. The abstract knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs are employed for tasks like planning and navigation. However, a significant challenge arises from the tendency of LLMs to produce "hallucinations" - outputs that are coherent yet factually incorrect or contextually unsuitable. This characteristic can lead to undesirable or unsafe actions in the CPS. Therefore, our research focuses on assuring the LLM-enabled CPS by enhancing their critical properties. We propose SafePilot, a novel hierarchical neuro-symbolic framework that provides end-to-end assurance for LLM-enabled CPS according to attribute-based and temporal specifications. Given a task and its specification, SafePilot first invokes a hierarchical planner with a discriminator that assesses task complexity. If the task is deemed manageable, it is passed directly to an LLM-based task planner with built-in verification. Otherwise, the hierarchical planner applies a divide-and-conquer strategy, decomposing the task into sub-tasks, each of which is individually planned and later merged into a final solution. The LLM-based task planner translates natural language constraints into formal specifications and verifies the LLM's output against them. If violations are detected, it identifies the flaw, adjusts the prompt accordingly, and re-invokes the LLM. This iterative process continues until a valid plan is produced or a predefined limit is reached. Our framework supports LLM-enabled CPS with both attribute-based and temporal constraints. Its effectiveness and adaptability are demonstrated through two illustrative case studies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.

Builds on

17 of 40 references.

References · 17

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
  3. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  4. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
  5. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  6. 2023Text2Motion: From Natural Language Instructions to Feasible Planscited by 224
  7. 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  8. 2024Chain of Thoughtlessness? An Analysis of CoT in Planningcited by 103
  9. 2023Plug in the Safety Chip: Enforcing Constraints for LLM-driven Robot Agentscited by 69
  10. 2020Visually-Grounded Planning without Vision: Language Models Infer Detailed Plans from High-level Instructionscited by 36
  11. 2024NL2Plan: Robust LLM-Driven Planning from Minimal Text Descriptionscited by 22
  12. 2023Conformal Temporal Logic Planning using Large Language Modelscited by 21
5 more
  1. 2023Can Large Language Models Provide Security & Privacy Advice? Measuring the Ability of LLMs to Refute Misconceptionscited by 20
  2. 2024P-RAG: Progressive Retrieval Augmented Generation For Planning on Embodied Everyday Taskcited by 15
  3. 2023GPT-in-the-Loop: Adaptive Decision-Making for Multiagent Systemscited by 9
  4. 2023Neuro Symbolic Reasoning for Planning: Counterexample Guided Inductive Synthesis using Large Language Models and Satisfiability Solvingcited by 6
  5. 2023Testing learning-enabled cyber-physical systems with Large-Language Models: A Formal Approachcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SafePlan: Leveraging Formal Logic and Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Enhanced Safety in LLM-based Robotic Task Planning
  2. 2025Enhancing Reliability in LLM-Integrated Robotic Systems: A Unified Approach to Security and Safety
  3. 2026From Prompt to Physical Actuation: Holistic Threat Modeling of LLM-Enabled Robotic Systems
  4. 2025Trust in LLM-controlled Robotics: a Survey of Security Threats, Defenses and Challenges
  5. 2026Towards Reliable and Robust LLM Planning: Symbolic Feedback-Driven Iterative Self-Refinement Framework
  6. 2025A Framework for Benchmarking and Aligning Task-Planning Safety in LLM-Based Embodied Agents
  7. 2025Safety Aware Task Planning via Large Language Models in Robotics
  8. 2025Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robots