Testing learning-enabled cyber-physical systems with Large-Language Models: A Formal Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The integration of machine learning (ML) into cyber-physical systems (CPS) offers significant benefits, including enhanced efficiency, predictive capabilities, real-time responsiveness, and the enabling of autonomous operations. This convergence has accelerated the development and deployment of a range of real-world applications, such as autonomous vehicles, delivery drones, service robots, and telemedicine procedures. However, the software development life cycle (SDLC) for AI-infused CPS diverges significantly from traditional approaches, featuring data and learning as two critical components. Existing verification and validation techniques are often inadequate for these new paradigms. In this study, we pinpoint the main challenges in ensuring formal safety for learningenabled CPS.We begin by examining testing as the most pragmatic method for verification and validation, summarizing the current state-of-the-art methodologies. Recognizing the limitations in current testing approaches to provide formal safety guarantees, we propose a roadmap to transition from foundational probabilistic testing to a more rigorous approach capable of delivering formal assurance.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.
Builds on
27 of 80 references.
References · 27
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2017AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 517
- 2021Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 372
- 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
- 2023Software Testing with Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and Visioncited by 163
- 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 129
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language Modelscited by 102
- 2018Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Scene Generationcited by 79
- 2020Verification of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Using ImageStarscited by 75
- 2021The Second International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2021): Summary and Resultscited by 71
- 2020An Analysis of Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Autonomous Driving Modelscited by 67
15 more
- 2020Real-time Out-of-distribution Detection in Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 46
- 2018Learning Linear Temporal Propertiescited by 41
- 2023ChatGPT for Shaping the Future of Dentistry: The Potential of Multi-Modal Large Language Modelcited by 40
- 2020Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Data Generationcited by 39
- 2023How Effective Are They? Exploring Large Language Model Based Fuzz Driver Generationcited by 21
- 2021Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems: Where Are We and Where Should We Go?cited by 19
- 2021Neural Network Guided Evolutionary Fuzzing for Finding Traffic Violations of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 19
- 2022Many-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of DNN-Enabled Systemscited by 18
- 2022MMFN: Multi-Modal-Fusion-Net for End-to-End Drivingcited by 17
- 2022LawBreaker: An Approach for Specifying Traffic Laws and Fuzzing Autonomous Vehiclescited by 15
- 2020A Declarative Metamorphic Testing Framework for Autonomous Drivingcited by 10
- 2022Scenario-Based Test Reduction and Prioritization for Multi-Module Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 6
- 2021Linear-time Temporal Logic guided Greybox Fuzzingcited by 5
- 2023GARL: Genetic Algorithm-Augmented Reinforcement Learning to Detect Violations in Marker-Based Autonomous Landing Systemscited by 5
- 2023Fully Automated Verification of Linear Time-Invariant Systems against Signal Temporal Logic Specifications via Reachability Analysiscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025NeuroStrata: Harnessing Neurosymbolic Paradigms for Improved Design, Testability, and Verifiability of Autonomous CPScited by 5
- 20253D Software Synthesis Driven by Constraint-Expressive Intermediate Representationcited by 3
- 2025Lumos: Let there be Language Model System Certificationcited by 1
- 2026SafePilot: A Framework for Assuring LLM-enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 0
- 2026Agentic Generation and Evolution of Knowledge Modelscited by 0
- 2026Agentic Generation and Evolution of Knowledge Models2 Jun 2026
- 2026SafePilot: A Framework for Assuring LLM-enabled Cyber-Physical Systems23 Mar 2026
- 2025Lumos: Let there be Language Model System Certification2 Dec 2025
- 20253D Software Synthesis Driven by Constraint-Expressive Intermediate Representation24 Jul 2025
- 2025NeuroStrata: Harnessing Neurosymbolic Paradigms for Improved Design, Testability, and Verifiability of Autonomous CPS17 Feb 2025