mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Reliable and Robust LLM Planning: Symbolic Feedback-Driven Iterative Self-Refinement Framework

arXiv 2606.27757 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have attracted widespread attention from academia and industry, yet their deployment raises critical security concerns regarding robustness and reliability. Planning, a core component of intelligent behavior, remains challenging for LLMs, which often produce infeasible or incorrect solutions in long-horizon decision-making tasks due to inherent complexity. In this paper, we propose a symbolic feedback-driven iterative self-refinement framework to enhance the robustness and reliability of LLMs in long-horizon planning. Specifically, a natural language prompting mechanism is introduced to map logical symbols into natural language descriptions, enabling LLMs to better capture task constraints and semantics. We further design a symbolic verifier that identifies errors and converts them into corrective instructions interpretable by the LLM, thereby guiding self-refinement. In addition, we leverage a plan recognizer to infer goal reachability, facilitating more effective guidance toward desired goals. Empirical results demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently improves both feasibility and correctness in long-horizon planning tasks. This highlights its effectiveness in enhancing the reliability of LLM-based planning and potential to enable more trustworthy AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.

Builds on

13 of 29 references.

References · 13

  1. 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 382
  2. 2023AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language Modelscited by 196
  3. 2025Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMscited by 172
  4. 2024GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluationscited by 120
  5. 2024LLMs Still Can't Plan; Can LRMs? A Preliminary Evaluation of OpenAI's o1 on PlanBenchcited by 94
  6. 2025PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning Capabilitiescited by 83
  7. 2024Can Large Language Models Reason and Plan?cited by 82
  8. 2023ISR-LLM: Iterative Self-Refined Large Language Model for Long-Horizon Sequential Task Planningcited by 77
  9. 2021A Survey on Neural-symbolic Learning Systemscited by 39
  10. 2021Long-Horizon Multi-Robot Rearrangement Planning for Construction Assemblycited by 24
  11. 2023Automating the Generation of Prompts for LLM-based Action Choice in PDDL Planningcited by 24
  12. 2026Why Reasoning Fails to Plan: A Planning-Centric Analysis of Long-Horizon Decision Making in LLM Agentscited by 23
1 more
  1. 2025Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Towards Improving the Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LLMs Can Plan Only If We Tell Them
  2. 2024Chasing Progress, Not Perfection: Revisiting Strategies for End-to-End LLM Plan Generation
  3. 2025Deliberate Planning in Language Models with Symbolic Representation
  4. 2025Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey
  5. 2024Can We Rely on LLM Agents to Draft Long-Horizon Plans? Let's Take TravelPlanner as an Example
  6. 2024LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks
  7. 2025Can LLM-Reasoning Models Replace Classical Planning? A Benchmark Study
  8. 2025Hierarchical Planning for Complex Tasks with Knowledge Graph-RAG and Symbolic Verification