mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Harmful Visual Content Manipulation Matters in Misinformation Detection Under Multimedia Scenarios

arXiv 2603.21054 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.MMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, the widespread dissemination of misinformation across numerous social media platforms has led to severe negative effects on society. To address this challenge, the automatic detection of misinformation, particularly under multimedia scenarios, has gained significant attention from both academic and industrial communities, leading to the emergence of a research task known as Multimodal Misinformation Detection (MMD). Typically, current MMD approaches focus on capturing the semantic relationships and inconsistency between various modalities but often overlook certain critical indicators within multimodal content. Recent research has shown that manipulated features within visual content in social media articles serve as valuable clues for MMD. Meanwhile, we argue that the potential intentions behind the manipulation, e.g., harmful and harmless, also matter in MMD. Therefore, in this study, we aim to identify such multimodal misinformation by capturing two types of features: manipulation features, which represent if visual content has been manipulated, and intention features, which assess the nature of these manipulations, distinguishing between harmful and harmless intentions. Unfortunately, the manipulation and intention labels that supervise these features to be discriminative are unknown. To address this, we introduce two weakly supervised indicators as substitutes by incorporating supplementary datasets focused on image manipulation detection and framing two different classification tasks as positive and unlabeled learning issues. With this framework, we introduce an innovative MMD approach, titled Harmful Visual Content Manipulation Matters in MMD (HAVC-M4 D). Comprehensive experiments conducted on four prevalent MMD datasets indicate that HAVC-M4 D significantly and consistently enhances the performance of existing MMD methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.

Builds on

33 of 71 references.

References · 33

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  6. 2016CNN Architectures for Large-Scale Audio Classificationcited by 701
  7. 2018FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Spatialtemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Mediacited by 281
  8. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  9. 2018Fighting Fake News: Image Splice Detection via Learned Self-Consistencycited by 136
  10. 2021MVSS-Net: Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervised Networks for Image Manipulation Detectioncited by 117
  11. 2021Image Manipulation Detection by Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervisioncited by 111
  12. 2022ObjectFormer for Image Manipulation Detection and Localizationcited by 78
21 more
  1. 2023Bad Actor, Good Advisor: Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Fake News Detectioncited by 69
  2. 2022MDFEND: Multi-domain Fake News Detectioncited by 68
  3. 2021Improving Fake News Detection by Using an Entity-enhanced Framework to Fuse Diverse Multimodal Cluescited by 48
  4. 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
  5. 2022FakeSV: A Multimodal Benchmark with Rich Social Context for Fake News Detection on Short Video Platformscited by 41
  6. 2018Classification from Positive, Unlabeled and Biased Negative Datacited by 34
  7. 2022Zoom Out and Observe: News Environment Perception for Fake News Detectioncited by 34
  8. 2024Evidence-Driven Retrieval Augmented Response Generation for Online Misinformationcited by 32
  9. 2022Memory-Guided Multi-View Multi-Domain Fake News Detectioncited by 31
  10. 2022Bootstrapping Multi-view Representations for Fake News Detectioncited by 25
  11. 2024FakingRecipe: Detecting Fake News on Short Video Platforms from the Perspective of Creative Processcited by 25
  12. 2023Cross-modal Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Fake News Detectioncited by 23
  13. 2024Re-Search for The Truth: Multi-round Retrieval-augmented Large Language Models are Strong Fake News Detectorscited by 16
  14. 2020Edited Media Understanding Frames: Reasoning About the Intent and Implications of Visual Misinformationcited by 15
  15. 2023Two Heads Are Better Than One: Improving Fake News Video Detection by Correlating with Neighborscited by 15
  16. 2023Combating Online Misinformation Videos: Characterization, Detection, and Future Directionscited by 14
  17. 2024Why Misinformation is Created? Detecting them by Integrating Intent Featurescited by 11
  18. 2023Beyond Myopia: Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data through Holistic Predictive Trendscited by 9
  19. 2024Harmfully Manipulated Images Matter in Multimodal Misinformation Detectioncited by 9
  20. 2024FineFake: A Knowledge-Enriched Dataset for Fine-Grained Multi-Domain Fake News Detectioncited by 6
  21. 2023Bridging the Gap between Decision and Logits in Decision-based Knowledge Distillation for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.