mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Harmfully Manipulated Images Matter in Multimodal Misinformation Detection

arXiv 2407.19192 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2024cs.CL cs.CV cs.MMcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, misinformation is widely spreading over various social media platforms and causes extremely negative impacts on society. To combat this issue, automatically identifying misinformation, especially those containing multimodal content, has attracted growing attention from the academic and industrial communities, and induced an active research topic named Multimodal Misinformation Detection (MMD). Typically, existing MMD methods capture the semantic correlation and inconsistency between multiple modalities, but neglect some potential clues in multimodal content. Recent studies suggest that manipulated traces of the images in articles are non-trivial clues for detecting misinformation. Meanwhile, we find that the underlying intentions behind the manipulation, e.g., harmful and harmless, also matter in MMD. Accordingly, in this work, we propose to detect misinformation by learning manipulation features that indicate whether the image has been manipulated, as well as intention features regarding the harmful and harmless intentions of the manipulation. Unfortunately, the manipulation and intention labels that make these features discriminative are unknown. To overcome the problem, we propose two weakly supervised signals as alternatives by introducing additional datasets on image manipulation detection and formulating two classification tasks as positive and unlabeled learning problems. Based on these ideas, we propose a novel MMD method, namely Harmfully Manipulated Images Matter in MMD (HAMI-M3D). Extensive experiments across three benchmark datasets can demonstrate that HAMI-M3D can consistently improve the performance of any MMD baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2024.

Builds on

17 of 47 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2018FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Spatialtemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Mediacited by 281
  5. 2018Fighting Fake News: Image Splice Detection via Learned Self-Consistencycited by 136
  6. 2021MVSS-Net: Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervised Networks for Image Manipulation Detectioncited by 117
  7. 2021Image Manipulation Detection by Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervisioncited by 111
  8. 2019Exploiting Multi-domain Visual Information for Fake News Detectioncited by 48
  9. 2021Improving Fake News Detection by Using an Entity-enhanced Framework to Fuse Diverse Multimodal Cluescited by 48
  10. 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
  11. 2021FReTAL: Generalizing Deepfake Detection using Knowledge Distillation and Representation Learningcited by 43
  12. 2022Generalizing to the Future: Mitigating Entity Bias in Fake News Detectioncited by 38
5 more
  1. 2022Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspectivecited by 37
  2. 2018Classification from Positive, Unlabeled and Biased Negative Datacited by 34
  3. 2023Combating Online Misinformation Videos: Characterization, Detection, and Future Directionscited by 14
  4. 2020MixPUL: Consistency-based Augmentation for Positive and Unlabeled Learningcited by 5
  5. 2023Bridging the Gap between Decision and Logits in Decision-based Knowledge Distillation for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

9 papers.