When Self-Belief Misleads: Active Label Acquisition for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in reasoning capabilities empowered by Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). Nonetheless, RLVR intrinsically relies on ground-truth labels for reward computation, the acquisition of which is often prohibitively expensive in real-world scenarios. While unsupervised RLVR paradigms attempt to circumvent this by training on pseudo-labels, they are notoriously susceptible to training collapse. Moreover, different samples often exhibit varying annotation values. In this paper, we propose Reinforcement Learning with Active Verifiable Rewards (RLAVR), which actively acquires ground-truth labels for a small set of selected samples and integrates them with pseudo-labels, thereby stabilizing training dynamics and improving performance under limited annotation budgets. To identify valuable samples, we propose the Corrective Advantage Gap (CAG) metric and analyze the sample-level supervision value. Building on this, we introduce Correction-Aware Reliability Estimation for RLAVR (CARE), which translates the oracle CAG criterion into a practical pre-query acquisition policy to substantially improve training stability. Extensive experiments across diverse domains, model families, and model scales demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of our approach. Our code is available at https://github.com/Lumina04/CARE.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026When Not to Imitate: Boundary-Aware Skill Memory for Reliable Tool-Use LLM Agentscited by 1
- 2026When May a Model Replace the Experiment? Audits, Licenses, and the Price of Trust in Surrogate-Driven Designcited by 0
- 2026TGRL: Temperature-Grouped Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Exploration in LLMscited by 0
- 2026When Updating Stops Being Learning: Rethinking LLM Self-Evolution via learnable information gaincited by 0
- 2026SAKI: Maximal-Coupling-Routed Teacher Supervision for On-Policy Distillationcited by 0
- 2026SAKI: Maximal-Coupling-Routed Teacher Supervision for On-Policy Distillation29 Sep 2026
- 2026When Updating Stops Being Learning: Rethinking LLM Self-Evolution via learnable information gain29 Sep 2026
- 2026TGRL: Temperature-Grouped Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Exploration in LLMs27 Sep 2026
- 2026When Not to Imitate: Boundary-Aware Skill Memory for Reliable Tool-Use LLM Agents23 Aug 2026
- 2026When May a Model Replace the Experiment? Audits, Licenses, and the Price of Trust in Surrogate-Driven Design2 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Can LLMs Learn to Reason Robustly under Noisy Supervision?
- 2025Extending RLVR to Open-Ended Tasks via Verifiable Multiple-Choice Reformulation
- 2026Rewards as Labels: Revisiting RLVR from a Classification Perspective
- 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
- 2026Boosting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards via Randomly Selected Few-Shot Guidance
- 2026From RLVR to RLSVR: Task Transformation Induces Self-Verifiable Rewards for Open-Ended LLM Self-Improvement
- 2026Rate or Fate? RLV^varepsilonR: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Noisy Rewards
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs