Sharpness Aware Surrogate Training for Spiking Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Surrogate gradients are a standard tool for training spiking neural networks (SNNs), but conventional hard forward or surrogate backward training couples a nonsmooth forward model with a biased gradient estimator. We study sharpness aware Surrogate Training (SAST), which applies sharpness aware Minimization (SAM) to a surrogate forward SNN trained by backpropagation. In this formulation, the optimization target is an ordinary smooth empirical risk, so the training gradient is exact for the auxiliary model being optimized. Under explicit boundedness and contraction assumptions, we derive compact state stability and input Lipschitz bounds, establish smoothness of the surrogate objective, provide a first order SAM approximation bound, and prove a nonconvex convergence guarantee for stochastic SAST with an independent second minibatch. We also isolate a local mechanism proposition, stated separately from the unconditional guarantees, that links per sample parameter gradient control to smaller input gradient norms under local Jacobian conditioning. Empirically, we evaluate clean accuracy, hard spike transfer, corruption robustness, and training overhead on N-MNIST and DVS Gesture. The clearest practical effect is transfer gap reduction: on N-MNIST, hard spike accuracy rises from 65.7% to 94.7% (best at ρ=0.30) while surrogate forward accuracy remains high; on DVS Gesture, hard spike accuracy improves from 31.8% to 63.3% (best at ρ=0.40). We additionally specify the compute matched, calibration, and theory alignment controls required for a final practical assessment.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2026.
Builds on
25 of 36 references.
References · 25
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2019Event-based Vision: A Surveycited by 1,010
- 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 604
- 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
- 2017Spatio-Temporal Backpropagation for Training High-performance Spiking Neural Networkscited by 399
- 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 311
- 2015Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccadescited by 308
13 more
- 2021ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
- 2018SLAYER: Spike Layer Error Reassignment in Timecited by 257
- 2021Training Spiking Neural Networks Using Lessons From Deep Learningcited by 251
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2018Going Deeper in Spiking Neural Networks: VGG and Residual Architecturescited by 236
- 2016Training Deep Spiking Neural Networks using Backpropagationcited by 203
- 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 187
- 2018Long short-term memory and learning-to-learn in networks of spiking neuronscited by 179
- 2017SuperSpike: Supervised learning in multi-layer spiking neural networkscited by 178
- 2021Efficient Sharpness-aware Minimization for Improved Training of Neural Networkscited by 137
- 2016Robust Large Margin Deep Neural Networkscited by 117
- 2022How Does Sharpness-Aware Minimization Minimize Sharpness?cited by 64
- 2015Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systemscited by 47
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.