Sharpness-Aware Surrogate Training for On-Sensor Spiking Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are a natural computational model for on-sensor and near-sensor vision, where event driven processors must operate under strict power budgets with hard binary spikes. However, models trained with surrogate gradients often degrade sharply when the smooth surrogate nonlinearity is replaced by a hard threshold at deployment; a surrogate-to-hard transfer gap that directly limits on-sensor accuracy. We study Sharpness-Aware Surrogate Training (SAST), which applies Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) to a surrogate-forward SNN so that the training objective is smooth and the gradient is exact, and position it as one gap-reduction strategy under the tested settings rather than the only viable mechanism. Under explicit contraction assumptions we provide state-stability, input-Lipschitz, and smoothness bounds, together with a corresponding nonconvex convergence result. On two event-camera benchmarks, swap-only hard-spike accuracy improves from 65.7% to 94.7% on N-MNIST and from 31.8% to 63.3% on DVS Gesture. Under a hardware-aware inference simulation (INT8/INT4 weight quantization, fixed-point membrane potentials, discrete leak factors), SAST remains strong: on N-MNIST, hard-spike accuracy improves from 47.6% to 96.9% (INT8) and from 43.2% to 81.0% (INT4), while on DVS Gesture it improves from 25.3% to 47.6% (INT8) and from 26.0% to 43.8% (INT4). SynOps also decrease under the same hardware-aware setting, including 1734krightarrow1315k (N-MNIST, INT8) and 86221krightarrow4323k (DVS Gesture, INT8). These results suggest that SAST is a promising component in a broader toolbox for on-sensor spiking inference under the tested settings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2019Event-based Vision: A Surveycited by 1,010
- 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 604
- 2017Spatio-Temporal Backpropagation for Training High-performance Spiking Neural Networkscited by 399
- 2015Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccadescited by 308
- 2021ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
- 2018SLAYER: Spike Layer Error Reassignment in Timecited by 257
- 2021Training Spiking Neural Networks Using Lessons From Deep Learningcited by 251
- 2018Going Deeper in Spiking Neural Networks: VGG and Residual Architecturescited by 236
- 2018Long short-term memory and learning-to-learn in networks of spiking neuronscited by 179
- 2017SuperSpike: Supervised learning in multi-layer spiking neural networkscited by 178
- 2020RMP-SNN: Residual Membrane Potential Neuron for Enabling Deeper High-Accuracy and Low-Latency Spiking Neural Networkcited by 141
5 more
- 2023Optimal ANN-SNN Conversion for High-accuracy and Ultra-low-latency Spiking Neural Networkscited by 116
- 2021A Free Lunch From ANN: Towards Efficient, Accurate Spiking Neural Networks Calibrationcited by 111
- 2022How Does Sharpness-Aware Minimization Minimize Sharpness?cited by 64
- 2015Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systemscited by 47
- 2026Sharpness Aware Surrogate Training for Spiking Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026On the second-order optimization for spiking neural networks24 Sep 2026