mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gender Disambiguation in Machine Translation: Diagnostic Evaluation in Decoder-Only Architectures

arXiv 2603.17952 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models achieve state-of-the-art results across a wide range of NLP tasks, they remain prone to systematic biases. Among these, gender bias is particularly salient in MT, due to systematic differences across languages in whether and how gender is marked. As a result, translation often requires disambiguating implicit source signals into explicit gender-marked forms. In this context, standard benchmarks may capture broad disparities but fail to reflect the full complexity of gender bias in modern MT. In this paper, we extend recent frameworks on bias evaluation by: (i) introducing a novel measure coined "Prior Bias", capturing a model's default gender assumptions, and (ii) applying the framework to decoder-only MT models. Our results show that, despite their scale and state-of-the-art status, decoder-only models do not generally outperform encoder-decoder architectures on gender-specific metrics; however, post-training (e.g., instruction tuning) not only improves contextual awareness but also reduces the masculine Prior Bias.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.

Builds on

49 of 75 references.

References · 49

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  5. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
  6. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  7. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  8. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
  9. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  10. 2020Long Range Arena: A Benchmark for Efficient Transformerscited by 696
  11. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  12. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
37 more
  1. 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 344
  2. 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
  3. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 247
  4. 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 247
  5. 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
  6. 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
  7. 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
  8. 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
  9. 2022Prompting PaLM for Translation: Assessing Strategies and Performancecited by 144
  10. 2021Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Modelscited by 141
  11. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
  12. 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
  13. 2021A Survey on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processingcited by 89
  14. 2020Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation Problemcited by 86
  15. 2019Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolutioncited by 84
  16. 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
  17. 2025WMT24++: Expanding the Language Coverage of WMT24 to 55 Languages & Dialectscited by 79
  18. 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  19. 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
  20. 2020Gender in Danger? Evaluating Speech Translation Technology on the MuST-SHE Corpuscited by 57
  21. 2021NeuTral Rewriter: A Rule-Based and Neural Approach to Automatic Rewriting into Gender-Neutral Alternativescited by 46
  22. 2019When and Why is Document-level Context Useful in Neural Machine Translation?cited by 45
  23. 2021They, Them, Theirs: Rewriting with Gender-Neutral Englishcited by 44
  24. 2023Quantifying Context Mixing in Transformerscited by 43
  25. 2019Filling Gender & Number Gaps in Neural Machine Translation with Black-box Context Injectioncited by 27
  26. 2021Do Context-Aware Translation Models Pay the Right Attention?cited by 21
  27. 2019Analysing Neural Language Models: Contextual Decomposition Reveals Default Reasoning in Number and Gender Assignmentcited by 20
  28. 2019Unsupervised Discovery of Gendered Language through Latent-Variable Modelingcited by 19
  29. 2021Evaluating Gender Bias in Hindi-English Machine Translationcited by 19
  30. 2022The Birth of Bias: A case study on the evolution of gender bias in an English language modelcited by 16
  31. 2024PrExMe! Large Scale Prompt Exploration of Open Source LLMs for Machine Translation and Summarization Evaluationcited by 15
  32. 2019Using Word Embeddings to Examine Gender Bias in Dutch Newspapers, 1950-1990cited by 11
  33. 2024On Measuring Context Utilization in Document-Level MT Systemscited by 9
  34. 2025Are We Paying Attention to Her? Investigating Gender Disambiguation and Attention in Machine Translationcited by 7
  35. 2021A Dynamic Head Importance Computation Mechanism for Neural Machine Translationcited by 4
  36. 2024Gender Bias in Machine Translation and The Era of Large Language Modelscited by 4
  37. 2019Debiasing Word Embeddings Improves Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.