Does YOLO Really Need to See Every Training Image in Every Epoch?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
YOLO detectors are known for their fast inference speed, yet training them remains unexpectedly time-consuming due to their exhaustive pipeline that processes every training image in every epoch, even when many images have already been sufficiently learned. This stands in clear contrast to the efficiency suggested by the ``You Only Look Once'' philosophy. This naturally raises an important question: textitDoes YOLO really need to see every training image in every epoch? To explore this, we propose an Anti-Forgetting Sampling Strategy (AFSS) that dynamically determines which images should be used and which can be skipped during each epoch, allowing the detector to learn more effectively and efficiently. Specifically, AFSS measures the learning sufficiency of each training image as the minimum of its detection recall and precision, and dynamically categorizes training images into easy, medium, or hard levels accordingly. Easy training images are sparsely resampled during training in a continuous review manner, with priority given to those that have not been used for a long time to reduce redundancy and prevent forgetting. Moderate training images are partially selected, prioritizing recently unused ones and randomly choosing the rest from unselected images to ensure coverage and prevent forgetting. Hard training images are fully sampled in every epoch to ensure sufficient learning. The learning sufficiency of each training image is periodically updated, enabling detectors to adaptively shift its focus toward the informative training images over time while progressively discarding redundant ones. On widely used natural image detection benchmarks (MS COCO 2017 and PASCAL VOC 2007) and remote sensing detection datasets (DOTA-v1.0 and DIOR-R), AFSS achieves more than 1.43× training speedup for YOLO-series detectors while also improving accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.
Builds on
37 of 50 references.
References · 37
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,431
- 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,087
- 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,071
- 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 982
25 more
- 2018Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentationcited by 798
- 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2017DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 623
- 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 540
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 531
- 2021RepVGG: Making VGG-style ConvNets Great Againcited by 522
- 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 515
- 2018Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Surveycited by 392
- 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 377
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 328
- 2025YOLOv12: Attention-Centric Real-Time Object Detectorscited by 305
- 2021TOOD: Task-aligned One-stage Object Detectioncited by 218
- 2021OTA: Optimal Transport Assignment for Object Detectioncited by 178
- 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 133
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Dataset Distillationcited by 115
- 2021Anchor-free Oriented Proposal Generator for Object Detectioncited by 105
- 2025YOLO26: Key Architectural Enhancements and Performance Benchmarking for Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 79
- 2019Curriculum Self-Paced Learning for Cross-Domain Object Detectioncited by 39
- 2016Self Paced Deep Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 25
- 2024Multi-modal Vision Pre-training for Medical Image Analysiscited by 23
- 2023Learning to View: Decision Transformers for Active Object Detectioncited by 11
- 2020Usable Information and Evolution of Optimal Representations During Trainingcited by 6
- 2024Simple In-place Data Augmentation for Surveillance Object Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.