Humans and transformer LMs: Abstraction drives language learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Categorization is a core component of human linguistic competence. We investigate how a transformer-based language model (LM) learns linguistic categories by comparing its behaviour over the course of training to behaviours which characterize abstract feature-based and concrete exemplar-based accounts of human language acquisition. We investigate how lexical semantic and syntactic categories emerge using novel divergence-based metrics that track learning trajectories using next-token distributions. In experiments with GPT-2 small, we find that (i) when a construction is learned, abstract class-level behaviour is evident at earlier steps than lexical item-specific behaviour, and (ii) that different linguistic behaviours emerge abruptly in sequence at different points in training, revealing that abstraction plays a key role in how LMs learn. This result informs the models of human language acquisition that LMs may serve as an existence proof for.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.
Builds on
30 of 73 references.
References · 30
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
- 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 515
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
- 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 239
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 191
- 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 121
- 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 111
18 more
- 2021Probing Across Time: What Does RoBERTa Know and When?cited by 73
- 2024Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNscited by 65
- 2024Demystifying Verbatim Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 55
- 2024CausalGym: Benchmarking causal interpretability methods on linguistic taskscited by 45
- 2021Refining Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 41
- 2023Language acquisition: do children and language models follow similar learning stages?cited by 40
- 2024Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidencecited by 35
- 2023Characterizing Learning Curves During Language Model Pre-Training: Learning, Forgetting, and Stabilitycited by 34
- 2022When classifying grammatical role, BERT doesn't care about word order... except when it matterscited by 24
- 2020Investigating Novel Verb Learning in BERT: Selectional Preference Classes and Alternation-Based Syntactic Generalizationcited by 16
- 2022Does BERT really agree ? Fine-grained Analysis of Lexical Dependence on a Syntactic Taskcited by 13
- 2023How Abstract Is Linguistic Generalization in Large Language Models? Experiments with Argument Structurecited by 13
- 2024Evidence from fMRI Supports a Two-Phase Abstraction Process in Language Modelscited by 13
- 2023Verb Conjugation in Transformers Is Determined by Linear Encodings of Subject Numbercited by 12
- 2024Generalisation First, Memorisation Second? Memorisation Localisation for Natural Language Classification Taskscited by 9
- 2019Hierarchical Representation in Neural Language Models: Suppression and Recovery of Expectationscited by 8
- 2023Abstraction via exemplars? A representational case study on lexical category inference in BERTcited by 5
- 2022Syntactic Substitutability as Unsupervised Dependency Syntaxcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.