Syntactic Substitutability as Unsupervised Dependency Syntax
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Syntax is a latent hierarchical structure which underpins the robust and compositional nature of human language. In this work, we explore the hypothesis that syntactic dependencies can be represented in language model attention distributions and propose a new method to induce these structures theory-agnostically. Instead of modeling syntactic relations as defined by annotation schemata, we model a more general property implicit in the definition of dependency relations, syntactic substitutability. This property captures the fact that words at either end of a dependency can be substituted with words from the same category. Substitutions can be used to generate a set of syntactically invariant sentences whose representations are then used for parsing. We show that increasing the number of substitutions used improves parsing accuracy on natural data. On long-distance subject-verb agreement constructions, our method achieves 79.5% recall compared to 8.9% using a previous method. Our method also provides improvements when transferred to a different parsing setup, demonstrating that it generalizes.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2022.
Builds on
21 of 38 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
- 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 269
- 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 239
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 191
- 2020Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTcited by 109
- 2019Do Attention Heads in BERT Track Syntactic Dependencies?cited by 87
9 more
- 2019Compound Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars for Grammar Inductioncited by 76
- 2020Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Inductioncited by 47
- 2020Do Neural Language Models Show Preferences for Syntactic Formalisms?cited by 30
- 2022When classifying grammatical role, BERT doesn't care about word order... except when it matterscited by 24
- 2020Unsupervised Parsing via Constituency Testscited by 23
- 2021Attention Can Reflect Syntactic Structure (If You Let It)cited by 22
- 2021On the Inductive Bias of Masked Language Modeling: From Statistical to Syntactic Dependenciescited by 18
- 2020Universal Dependencies according to BERT: both more specific and more generalcited by 11
- 2021Linguistic Dependencies and Statistical Dependencecited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024A Psycholinguistic Evaluation of Language Models' Sensitivity to Argument Rolescited by 14
- 2025Mechanisms vs. Outcomes: Probing for Syntax Fails to Explain Performance on Targeted Syntactic Evaluationscited by 7
- 2026Humans and transformer LMs: Abstraction drives language learningcited by 2
- 2024Inducing Systematicity in Transformers by Attending to Structurally Quantized Embeddingscited by 1
- 2026Humans and transformer LMs: Abstraction drives language learning18 Mar 2026
- 2025Mechanisms vs. Outcomes: Probing for Syntax Fails to Explain Performance on Targeted Syntactic Evaluations20 Jun 2025
- 2024A Psycholinguistic Evaluation of Language Models' Sensitivity to Argument Roles21 Oct 2024
- 2024Inducing Systematicity in Transformers by Attending to Structurally Quantized Embeddings9 Feb 2024