Cryptographic Runtime Governance for Autonomous AI Systems: The Aegis Architecture for Verifiable Policy Enforcement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contemporary AI governance frameworks rely heavily on post hoc oversight, policy guidance, and behavioral alignment techniques, yet these mechanisms become fragile as systems gain autonomy, speed, and operational opacity. This paper presents Aegis, a runtime governance architecture for autonomous AI systems that treats policy and legal constraints as execution conditions rather than advisory principles. Aegis binds each governed agent to a cryptographically sealed Immutable Ethics Policy Layer (IEPL) at system genesis and enforces external emissions through an Ethics Verification Agent (EVA), an Enforcement Kernel Module (EKM), and an Immutable Logging Kernel (ILK). Amendments to the governing policy layer require quorum approval and redeclaration of the system trust root; verified violations trigger autonomous shutdown and generation of auditable proof artifacts. We evaluate the architecture within the Civitas runtime using three operational measures: proof verification latency under tamper conditions, publication overhead, and alignment retention performance relative to an ungoverned baseline. In controlled trials, Aegis demonstrates median proof verification latency of 238 ms, median publication overhead of approximately 9.4 ms, and higher alignment retention than the baseline condition across matched tasks. We argue that these results support a shift in AI governance from discretionary oversight toward verifiable runtime constraint. Rather than claiming to resolve machine ethics in the abstract, the proposed architecture seeks to show that policy violating behavior can be rendered operationally non executable within a controlled runtime governance framework. The paper concludes by discussing methodological limits, evidentiary implications, and the role of proof oriented governance in high assurance AI deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2026.
Builds on
6 of 29 references.
References · 6
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
- 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
- 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
- 2025RvLLM: LLM Runtime Verification with Domain Knowledgecited by 15
- 2024Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practicescited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026When the Agent Is the Adversary: Architectural Requirements for Agentic AI Containment After the April 2026 Frontier Model Escapecited by 1
- 2026Runtime Governance for Agentic AI: Action-Boundary Control with Trusted Provenance and Fail-Closed Executioncited by 1
- 2026Ethical Hyper-Velocity (EHV): A Hardware-Rooted Zero-Trust Runtime Enforcement Architecture for Agentic AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026The Acknowledgment Point Is the System: Durable Policy-Decision Receipts for AI Audit Evidencecited by 0
- 2026The Acknowledgment Point Is the System: Durable Policy-Decision Receipts for AI Audit Evidence17 Aug 2026
- 2026Ethical Hyper-Velocity (EHV): A Hardware-Rooted Zero-Trust Runtime Enforcement Architecture for Agentic AI Systems18 May 2026
- 2026Runtime Governance for Agentic AI: Action-Boundary Control with Trusted Provenance and Fail-Closed Execution17 May 2026
- 2026When the Agent Is the Adversary: Architectural Requirements for Agentic AI Containment After the April 2026 Frontier Model Escape25 Apr 2026