MOSAIC: Composable Safety Alignment with Modular Control Tokens
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Safety alignment in large language models (LLMs) is commonly implemented as a single static policy embedded in model parameters. However, real-world deployments often require context-dependent safety rules that vary across users, regions, and applications. Existing approaches struggle to provide such conditional control: parameter-level alignment entangles safety behaviors with general capabilities, while prompt-based methods rely on natural language instructions that provide weak enforcement. We propose MOSAIC, a modular framework that enables compositional safety alignment through learnable control tokens optimized over a frozen backbone model. Each token represents a safety constraint and can be flexibly activated and composed at inference time. To train compositional tokens efficiently, we introduce order-based task sampling and a distribution-level alignment objective that mitigates over-refusal. Experiments show that MOSAIC achieves strong defense performance with substantially lower over-refusal while preserving model utility.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.
Builds on
19 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2026NeST: Neuron Selective Tuning for LLM Safety18 Feb
- 2026GRP-Obliteration: Unaligning LLMs With a Single Unlabeled Prompt5 Feb
- 2025Turning the Spell Around: Lightweight Alignment Amplification via Rank-One Safety Injection28 Aug
- 2025Logic Jailbreak: Efficiently Unlocking LLM Safety Restrictions Through Formal Logical Expression18 May
- 2024Controllable Safety Alignment: Inference-Time Adaptation to Diverse Safety Requirements11 Oct
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep10 Jun
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset10 Jul
Other references · 12
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 396
- 2024ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMscited by 149
- 2024Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 113
- 2024Evaluating Cultural and Social Awareness of LLM Web Agentscited by 45
- 2023The Alignment Ceiling: Objective Mismatch in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 42
- 2024From Distributional to Overton Pluralism: Investigating Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 33
- 2025PICACO: Pluralistic In-Context Value Alignment of LLMs via Total Correlation Optimizationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SafeSteer: Localized On-Policy Distillation for Efficient Safety Alignment
- 2024Towards Comprehensive Post Safety Alignment of Large Language Models via Safety Patching
- 2026PolicyAlign: Direct Policy-Based Safety Alignment for Large Language Models
- 2026Safety at One Shot: Patching Fine-Tuned LLMs with A Single Instance
- 2024Superficial Safety Alignment Hypothesis
- 2026Few Tokens, Big Leverage: Preserving Safety Alignment by Constraining Safety Tokens during Fine-tuning
- 2026Dialectics of Alignment: Harnessing Unsafe Knowledge for Dynamic Safety Routing
- 2025Safety Alignment Depth in Large Language Models: A Markov Chain Perspective