mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SafeSteer: Localized On-Policy Distillation for Efficient Safety Alignment

arXiv 2606.02530 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human values often degrades their general capabilities, termed the alignment tax. Existing methods mitigate this by balancing dual objectives, which heavily rely on massive general-purpose data or auxiliary reward models. In this paper, we argue that, because safety features are inherently sparse within the output distribution, alignment requires localized modifications rather than global trade-offs. To this end, we propose SafeSteer, which performs on-policy distillation confined to safety tokens. First, we construct a safety teacher via activation steering. Based on this teacher, we develop a safety token selection algorithm. Consequently, SafeSteer restricts the reverse KL penalty to these tokens during training to preserve general capabilities. Experimental results across diverse models show that our SafeSteer achieves a superior trade-off between safety and general capability compared with existing methods, attaining strong safety performance on seven safety benchmarks with only minimal degradation on five general capability benchmarks. Notably, SafeSteer requires only 100 harmful samples without using any general-purpose data, less than 1% of what previous baselines used, considerably reducing alignment cost. More details are on our project page at https://anjingkun.github.io/SafeSteer.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

26 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Mitigating the Safety Alignment Tax with Null-Space Constrained Policy Optimization12 Dec
  2. 2025Layer-Aware Representation Filtering: Purifying Finetuning Data to Preserve LLM Safety Alignment24 Jul
  3. 2025Improving LLM Safety Alignment with Dual-Objective Optimization5 Mar
  4. 2025Safety Tax: Safety Alignment Makes Your Large Reasoning Models Less Reasonable1 Mar
  5. 2025X-Boundary: Establishing Exact Safety Boundary to Shield LLMs from Multi-Turn Jailbreaks without Compromising Usability14 Feb
  6. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep10 Jun
  7. 2024One-Shot Safety Alignment for Large Language Models via Optimal Dualization29 May
  8. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback19 Oct
  9. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct
  10. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 16

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  4. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  5. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
  6. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
  7. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  8. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
  9. 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 302
  10. 2026Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipecited by 262
  11. 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 213
  12. 2026A Survey of On-Policy Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 148
4 more
  1. 2024ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teamingcited by 96
  2. 2025LLMs Encode Harmfulness and Refusal Separatelycited by 75
  3. 2024On the Role of Attention Heads in Large Language Model Safetycited by 70
  4. 2024Bi-Factorial Preference Optimization: Balancing Safety-Helpfulness in Language Modelscited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PolicyAlign: Direct Policy-Based Safety Alignment for Large Language Models
  2. 2025Constrained Language Model Policy Optimization via Risk-aware Stepwise Alignment
  3. 2026MOSAIC: Composable Safety Alignment with Modular Control Tokens
  4. 2024Towards Comprehensive Post Safety Alignment of Large Language Models via Safety Patching
  5. 2026Safety at One Shot: Patching Fine-Tuned LLMs with A Single Instance
  6. 2026Guardrails in Logit Space: Safety Token Regularization for LLM Alignment
  7. 2024Controllable Safety Alignment: Inference-Time Adaptation to Diverse Safety Requirements
  8. 2026Few Tokens, Big Leverage: Preserving Safety Alignment by Constraining Safety Tokens during Fine-tuning