mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Internet of Physical AI Agents: Interoperability, Longevity, and the Cost of Getting It Wrong

arXiv 2603.15900 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2026cs.NI cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Internet has evolved by progressively expanding what humanity connects: first computers, then people, and later billions of devices through the Internet of Things (IoT). While IoT succeeded in digitizing perception at scale, it also exposed fundamental limitations, including fragmentation, weak security, limited autonomy, and poor long-term sustainability. Today, advances in edge hardware, sensing, connectivity, and artificial intelligence enable a new phase: the Internet of Physical AI Agents. Unlike IoT devices that primarily sense and report, Physical AI Agents perceive, reason, and act in real time, operating autonomously and cooperatively across safety-critical domains such as disaster response, healthcare, industrial automation, and mobility. However, embedding fast-evolving AI capabilities into long-lived physical infrastructure introduces new architectural risks, particularly around interoperability, lifecycle management, and premature ossification. This article revisits lessons from IoT and Internet evolution, and articulates design principles for building resilient, evolvable, and trustworthy agentic systems. We present an architectural blueprint encompassing agentic identity, secure agent-to-agent communication, semantic interoperability, policy-governed runtimes, and observability-driven governance. We argue that treating evolution, trust, and interoperability as first-class requirements is essential to avoid hard-coding today's assumptions into tomorrow's intelligent infrastructure, and to prevent the high technical and economic cost of getting it wrong.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.

Builds on

5 of 16 references.

References · 5

  1. 2025Empowering Edge Intelligence: A Comprehensive Survey on On-Device AI Modelscited by 46
  2. 2021A Survey on Fundamental Limits of Integrated Sensing and Communicationcited by 19
  3. 2024Generative AI for the Optimization of Next-Generation Wireless Networks: Basics, State-of-the-Art, and Open Challengescited by 14
  4. 2020The Pace of Artificial Intelligence Innovations: Speed, Talent, and Trial-and-Errorcited by 13
  5. 2019A Performance Perspective on Web Optimized Protocol Stacks: TCP+TLS+HTTP/2 vs. QUICcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges
  2. 2026The Internet of Agentic AI: Communication, Coordination, and Collective Intelligence at Scale
  3. 2026Internet of Agentic Things: Networked AI Agents for Closed-Loop IoT Orchestration
  4. 2026Agentic IoT: Architectures, Applications, and Challenges Toward the Internet of Agents
  5. 2025Security of Internet of Agents: Attacks and Countermeasures
  6. 2025AI Agents: Evolution, Architecture, and Real-World Applications
  7. 2025Toward a Safe Internet of Agents
  8. 2025Agentic AI for Cyber Resilience: A New Security Paradigm and Its System-Theoretic Foundations