The PokeAgent Challenge: Competitive and Long-Context Learning at Scale
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present the PokeAgent Challenge, a large-scale benchmark for decision-making research built on Pokemon's multi-agent battle system and expansive role-playing game (RPG) environment. Partial observability, game-theoretic reasoning, and long-horizon planning remain open problems for frontier AI, yet few benchmarks stress all three simultaneously under realistic conditions. PokeAgent targets these limitations at scale through two complementary tracks: our Battling Track, which calls for strategic reasoning and generalization under partial observability in competitive Pokemon battles, and our Speedrunning Track, which requires long-horizon planning and sequential decision-making in the Pokemon RPG. Our Battling Track supplies a dataset of 20M+ battle trajectories alongside a suite of heuristic, RL, and LLM-based baselines capable of high-level competitive play. Our Speedrunning Track provides the first standardized evaluation framework for RPG speedrunning, including an open-source multi-agent orchestration system for modular, reproducible comparisons of harness-based LLM approaches. Our NeurIPS 2025 competition validates both the quality of our resources and the research community's interest in Pokemon, with over 100 teams competing across both tracks and winning solutions detailed in our paper. Participant submissions and our baselines reveal considerable gaps between generalist (LLM), specialist (RL), and elite human performance. Analysis against the BenchPress evaluation matrix shows that Pokemon battling is nearly orthogonal to standard LLM benchmarks, measuring capabilities not captured by existing suites and positioning Pokemon as an unsolved benchmark that can drive RL and LLM research forward. We transition to a living benchmark with a live leaderboard for Battling and self-contained evaluation for Speedrunning at https://pokeagentchallenge.com.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026Continual Harness: Online Adaptation for Self-Improving Foundation Agentscited by 30
- 2026OpenGame: Open Agentic Coding for Gamescited by 12
- 2026Odysseus: Scaling VLMs to 100+ Turn Decision-Making in Games via Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2026Towards Generalist Game Players: An Investigation of Foundation Models in the Game Multiversecited by 2
- 2026PokeRL: Reinforcement Learning for Pokemon Redcited by 0
- 2026ASH: Agents that Self-Hone in Long-Horizon Worldscited by 0
- 2026PTCG-Bench: Can LLM Agents Master Pok'emon Trading Card Game?cited by 0
- 2026FromPitch2Board: Benchmarking LLM Agents in Long-Horizon Football Managementcited by 0
- 2026FromPitch2Board: Benchmarking LLM Agents in Long-Horizon Football Management28 Sep 2026
- 2026PTCG-Bench: Can LLM Agents Master Pok'emon Trading Card Game?28 May 2026
- 2026ASH: Agents that Self-Hone in Long-Horizon Worlds14 May 2026
- 2026Continual Harness: Online Adaptation for Self-Improving Foundation Agents11 May 2026
- 2026Towards Generalist Game Players: An Investigation of Foundation Models in the Game Multiverse11 May 2026
- 2026Odysseus: Scaling VLMs to 100+ Turn Decision-Making in Games via Reinforcement Learning1 May 2026
- 2026OpenGame: Open Agentic Coding for Games20 Apr 2026
- 2026PokeRL: Reinforcement Learning for Pokemon Red12 Apr 2026