mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantifying the Necessity of Chain of Thought through Opaque Serial Depth

arXiv 2603.09786 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) tend to externalize their reasoning in their chain of thought, making the chain of thought a good target for monitoring. This is partially an inherent feature of the Transformer architecture: sufficiently long serial cognition must pass through the chain of thought (Korbak et al., 2025). We formalize this argument through the notion of opaque serial depth, given by the length of the longest computation that can be done without the use of interpretable intermediate steps like chain of thought. Given this formalization, we compute numeric upper bounds on the opaque serial depth of Gemma 3 models, as well as asymptotic results for additional architectures beyond standard LLMs. We also open-source an automated method that can calculate upper bounds on the opaque serial depth of arbitrary neural networks, and use it to demonstrate that Mixture-of-Experts models likely have lower depth than dense models. Overall, our results suggest that opaque serial depth is a useful tool for understanding the potential for models to do significant reasoning that is not externalized.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

14 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Monitoring Monitorability20 Dec
  2. 2025A Pragmatic Way to Measure Chain-of-Thought Monitorability28 Oct
  3. 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety15 Jul
  4. 2025When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitors7 Jul
  5. 2025Soft Thinking: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of LLMs in Continuous Concept Space21 May
  6. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space9 Dec

Other references · 8

  1. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  2. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
  3. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  4. 2025Large Language Diffusion Modelscited by 872
  5. 2025LLMs are Single-threaded Reasoners: Demystifying the Working Mechanism of Soft Thinkingcited by 34
  6. 2025Text Generation Beyond Discrete Token Samplingcited by 21
  7. 2025MONA: Myopic Optimization with Non-myopic Approval Can Mitigate Multi-step Reward Hackingcited by 19
  8. 2025State over Tokens: Characterizing the Role of Reasoning Tokenscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026When Chain-of-Thought Helps and When It Hurts: An Empirical Investigation of the Serial-Depth Bottleneck in LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025Latent Chain-of-Thought? Decoding the Depth-Recurrent Transformer
  3. 2025A Formal Comparison Between Chain of Thought and Latent Thought
  4. 2025Deep Hidden Cognition Facilitates Reliable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  5. 2024Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problems
  6. 2026An Asymptotic Theory of Chain-of-Thought in In-Context Learning
  7. 2024Understanding Hidden Computations in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  8. 2024From Sparse Dependence to Sparse Attention: Unveiling How Chain-of-Thought Enhances Transformer Sample Efficiency