mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CLIOPATRA: Extracting Private Information from LLM Insights

arXiv 2603.09781 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread adoption of AI assistants has prompted the development of privacy-aware platforms designed to extract insights from real-world usage. Their privacy protections primarily rely on layering multiple heuristic techniques, such as PII redaction, clustering, aggregation, and LLM-based privacy auditing. In this paper, we put their privacy claims to the test by presenting CLIOPATRA, the first attack against ``privacy-preserving'' LLM-based insights systems. Our attack involves an adversary that carefully designs and inserts malicious chats into the system to break multiple layers of protections and induce the leakage of sensitive information from a target user's chat. We evaluate CLIOPATRA on one such platform, Anthropic's Clio, and target synthetically generated medical chats to show that an adversary can successfully and confidently (with nearly 100% precision) extract the medical history contained in these chats in up to 65% of cases. We also show that CLIOPATRA can stealthily extract information by obfuscating the private information in the generated insights. Finally, we demonstrate that existing ad hoc mitigations, such as LLM-based privacy auditing, are unreliable and fail to detect major leaks. Taken together, our findings indicate that, even when layered, current heuristic protections are insufficient to adequately protect user data, and that prompt injection has been an understudied risk in LLM-based insight systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents
  2. 2026Spore: Efficient and Training-Free Privacy Extraction Attack on LLMs via Inference-Time Hybrid Probing
  3. 2025The Canary's Echo: Auditing Privacy Risks of LLM-Generated Synthetic Text
  4. 2025PrivacyXray: Detecting Privacy Breaches in LLMs through Semantic Consistency and Probability Certainty
  5. 2026LLM-CEG: Extending the Classification Error Gauge Framework for Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models ↗
  6. 2025VortexPIA: Indirect Prompt Injection Attack against LLMs for Efficient Extraction of User Privacy
  7. 2026NeuroFilter: Activation-Based Guardrails for Privacy-Conscious LLM Agents
  8. 2024Preserving Privacy in Large Language Models: A Survey on Current Threats and Solutions