Efficient Credal Prediction through Decalibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A reliable representation of uncertainty is essential for the application of modern machine learning methods in safety-critical settings. In this regard, the use of credal sets (i.e., convex sets of probability distributions) has recently been proposed as a suitable approach to representing epistemic uncertainty. However, as with other approaches to epistemic uncertainty, training credal predictors is computationally complex and usually involves (re-)training an ensemble of models. The resulting computational complexity prevents their adoption for complex models such as foundation models and multi-modal systems. To address this problem, we propose an efficient method for credal prediction that is grounded in the notion of relative likelihood and inspired by techniques for the calibration of probabilistic classifiers. For each class label, our method predicts a range of plausible probabilities in the form of an interval. To produce the lower and upper bounds of these intervals, we propose a technique that we refer to as decalibration. Extensive experiments show that our method yields credal sets with strong performance across diverse tasks, including coverage-efficiency evaluation, out-of-distribution detection, and in-context learning. Notably, we demonstrate credal prediction on models such as TabPFN and CLIP -- architectures for which the construction of credal sets was previously infeasible.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2026.
Builds on
44 of 71 references.
References · 44
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,127
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
- 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
- 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 359
- 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
32 more
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
- 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 227
- 2021Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A Simple Baselinecited by 200
- 2019Ensemble Distribution Distillationcited by 158
- 2025TabArena: A Living Benchmark for Machine Learning on Tabular Datacited by 152
- 2020What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?cited by 148
- 2023Bayesian Low-rank Adaptation for Large Language Modelscited by 112
- 2020Masksembles for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 88
- 2024Variational Bayesian Last Layerscited by 67
- 2022Packed-Ensembles for Efficient Uncertainty Estimationcited by 49
- 2024BLoB: Bayesian Low-Rank Adaptation by Backpropagation for Large Language Modelscited by 48
- 2023Credal Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 45
- 2022Is one annotation enough? A data-centric image classification benchmark for noisy and ambiguous label estimationcited by 43
- 2023Is the Volume of a Credal Set a Good Measure for Epistemic Uncertainty?cited by 40
- 2023On Second-Order Scoring Rules for Epistemic Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 38
- 2019Deep Sub-Ensembles for Fast Uncertainty Estimation in Image Classificationcited by 36
- 2024Credal Learning Theorycited by 30
- 2024CreINNs: Credal-Set Interval Neural Networks for Uncertainty Estimation in Classification Taskscited by 26
- 2019Epistemic Uncertainty Samplingcited by 24
- 2024Uncertainty quantification for data-driven weather modelscited by 24
- 2024Shedding Light on Large Generative Networks: Estimating Epistemic Uncertainty in Diffusion Modelscited by 22
- 2024Conformalized Credal Set Predictorscited by 21
- 2024Credal Two-Sample Tests of Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 16
- 2021Credal Self-Supervised Learningcited by 15
- 2025Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods Answer the Wrong Questionscited by 14
- 2024Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in Classificationcited by 13
- 2025Integral Imprecise Probability Metricscited by 11
- 2025Credal Prediction based on Relative Likelihoodcited by 8
- 2025A calibration test for evaluating set-based epistemic uncertainty representationscited by 7
- 2024ALPBench: A Benchmark for Active Learning Pipelines on Tabular Datacited by 5
- 2025laplax -- Laplace Approximations with JAXcited by 5
- 2022Functional Ensemble Distillationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.