mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ALPBench: A Benchmark for Active Learning Pipelines on Tabular Data

arXiv 2406.17322 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In settings where only a budgeted amount of labeled data can be afforded, active learning seeks to devise query strategies for selecting the most informative data points to be labeled, aiming to enhance learning algorithms' efficiency and performance. Numerous such query strategies have been proposed and compared in the active learning literature. However, the community still lacks standardized benchmarks for comparing the performance of different query strategies. This particularly holds for the combination of query strategies with different learning algorithms into active learning pipelines and examining the impact of the learning algorithm choice. To close this gap, we propose ALPBench, which facilitates the specification, execution, and performance monitoring of active learning pipelines. It has built-in measures to ensure evaluations are done reproducibly, saving exact dataset splits and hyperparameter settings of used algorithms. In total, ALPBench consists of 86 real-world tabular classification datasets and 5 active learning settings, yielding 430 active learning problems. To demonstrate its usefulness and broad compatibility with various learning algorithms and query strategies, we conduct an exemplary study evaluating 9 query strategies paired with 8 learning algorithms in 2 different settings. We provide ALPBench here: https://github.com/ValentinMargraf/ActiveLearningPipelines.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2024.

Builds on

18 of 67 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  3. 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
  4. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
  5. 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
  6. 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
  7. 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 169
  8. 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 151
  9. 2022Active Learning on a Budget: Opposite Strategies Suit High and Low Budgetscited by 131
  10. 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
  11. 2020Active Domain Adaptation via Clustering Uncertainty-weighted Embeddingscited by 71
  12. 2019OpenML-Python: an extensible Python API for OpenMLcited by 62
6 more
  1. 2016A Benchmark and Comparison of Active Learning for Logistic Regressioncited by 36
  2. 2019Epistemic Uncertainty Samplingcited by 24
  3. 2022Is margin all you need? An extensive empirical study of active learning on tabular datacited by 10
  4. 2023An Expanded Benchmark that Rediscovers and Affirms the Edge of Uncertainty Sampling for Active Learning in Tabular Datasetscited by 4
  5. 2014When does Active Learning Work?cited by 3
  6. 2023PyExperimenter: Easily distribute experiments and track resultscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.