Alignment-Process-Outcome: Rethinking How AIs and Humans Collaborate
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In real-world collaboration, alignment, process structure, and outcome quality do not exhibit a simple linear or one-to-one correspondence: similar alignment may accompany either rapid convergence or extensive multi-branch exploration, and lead to different results. Existing accounts often isolate these dimensions or focus on specific participant types, limiting structural accounts of collaboration. We reconceptualize collaboration through two complementary lenses. The task lens models collaboration as trajectory evolution in a structured task space, revealing patterns such as advancement, branching, and backtracking. The intent lens examines how individual intents are expressed within shared contexts and enter situated decisions. Together, these lenses clarify the structural relationships among alignment, decision-making, and trajectory structure. Rather than reducing collaboration to outcome quality or treating alignment as the sole objective, we propose a unified dynamic view of the relationships among alignment, process, and outcome, and use it to re-examine collaboration structure across Human-Human, AI-AI, and Human-AI settings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2026.
Builds on
20 of 50 references.
References · 20
- 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agentscited by 622
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
- 2025Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systemscited by 125
- 2021To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 118
- 2021A Survey on Stance Detection for Mis- and Disinformation Identificationcited by 75
- 2018A Compact Embedding for Facial Expression Similaritycited by 41
- 2025Vibe coding: programming through conversation with artificial intelligencecited by 26
- 2024Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Frameworkcited by 25
- 2023Interactive AI Alignment: Specification, Process, and Evaluation Alignmentcited by 22
- 2024Designing for Human-Agent Alignment: Understanding what humans want from their agentscited by 18
- 2024SIGGesture: Generalized Co-Speech Gesture Synthesis via Semantic Injection with Large-Scale Pre-Training Diffusion Modelscited by 18
- 2025Exploring Collaboration Patterns and Strategies in Human-AI Co-creation through the Lens of Agency: A Scoping Review of the Top-tier HCI Literaturecited by 10
8 more
- 2024Exploring a Behavioral Model of "Positive Friction" in Human-AI Interactioncited by 9
- 2025OnGoal: Tracking and Visualizing Conversational Goals in Multi-Turn Dialogue with Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Intent Tagging: Exploring Micro-Prompting Interactions for Supporting Granular Human-GenAI Co-Creation Workflowscited by 6
- 2025A11yShape: AI-Assisted 3-D Modeling for Blind and Low-Vision Programmerscited by 4
- 2025"The Diagram is like Guardrails": Structuring GenAI-assisted Hypotheses Exploration with an Interactive Shared Representationcited by 3
- 2026Cognitive Biases in LLM-Assisted Software Developmentcited by 3
- 2025Designing Telepresence Robots to Support Place Attachmentcited by 1
- 2025Trade-offs in Social-Norm Framings for Health Chatbots: Balancing Trust and Preferencecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.