mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

3ViewSense: Spatial and Mental Perspective Reasoning from Orthographic Views in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2603.07751 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2026cs.CV cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Current Large Language Models have achieved Olympiad-level logic, yet Vision-Language Models paradoxically falter on elementary spatial tasks like block counting. This capability mismatch reveals a critical ``spatial intelligence gap,'' where models fail to construct coherent 3D mental representations from 2D observations. We uncover this gap via diagnostic analyses showing the bottleneck is a missing view-consistent spatial interface rather than insufficient visual features or weak reasoning. To bridge this, we introduce 3ViewSense, a framework that grounds spatial reasoning in Orthographic Views. Drawing on engineering cognition, we propose a ``Simulate-and-Reason'' mechanism that decomposes complex scenes into canonical orthographic projections to resolve geometric ambiguities. By aligning egocentric perceptions with these allocentric references, our method facilitates explicit mental rotation and reconstruction. Empirical results on spatial reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing baselines, with consistent gains on occlusion-heavy counting and view-consistent spatial reasoning. The framework also improves the stability and consistency of spatial descriptions, offering a scalable path toward stronger spatial intelligence in multimodal systems.~footnotehttps://github.com/Jasaxion/3ViewSense

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.

Builds on

14 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SpatialLadder: Progressive Training for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models9 Oct
  2. 2025ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models27 May
  3. 2025SpaceR: Reinforcing MLLMs in Video Spatial Reasoning2 Apr
  4. 2025Improved Visual-Spatial Reasoning via R1-Zero-Like Training1 Apr
  5. 2025SpatialCoT: Advancing Spatial Reasoning through Coordinate Alignment and Chain-of-Thought for Embodied Task Planning17 Jan

Other references · 9

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  3. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
  4. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
  5. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  6. 2025OpenThinkIMG: Learning to Think with Images via Visual Tool Reinforcement Learningcited by 163
  7. 2025Reinforced Visual Perception with Toolscited by 38
  8. 2025Holistic Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs on Spatial Intelligencecited by 29
  9. 2026Grouter: Decoupling Routing from Representation for Accelerated MoE Trainingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reasoning Path and Latent State Analysis for Multi-view Visual Spatial Reasoning: A Cognitive Science Perspective
  2. 2026Thinking in Structures: Evaluating Spatial Intelligence in Constraint-Governed Spaces
  3. 2025Think with 3D: Geometric Imagination Grounded Spatial Reasoning from Limited Views
  4. 2025Imagine in Space: Exploring the Frontier of Spatial Intelligence and Reasoning Efficiency in Vision Language Models
  5. 2026SpaceCast-Bench: Evaluating Predictive Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey of Tasks, Benchmarks and Methods
  8. 2025Pursuing Minimal Sufficiency in Spatial Reasoning