mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Should AI Safety Benchmarks Benchmark Safety?

arXiv 2601.23112 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2026cs.CYcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI safety benchmarks are pivotal for safety in advanced AI systems; however, they have significant technical, epistemic, and sociotechnical shortcomings. We present a review of 210 safety benchmarks that maps out common challenges in safety benchmarking, documenting failures and limitations by drawing from engineering sciences and long-established theories of risk and safety. We argue that adhering to established risk management principles, mapping the space of what can(not) be measured, developing robust probabilistic metrics, and efficiently deploying measurement theory to connect benchmarking objectives with the world can significantly improve the validity and usefulness of AI safety benchmarks. The review provides a roadmap on how to improve AI safety benchmarking, and we illustrate the effectiveness of these recommendations through quantitative and qualitative evaluation. We also provide workflow-oriented guiding questions with illustrative benchmark that help researchers and practitioners develop robust and epistemologically sound safety benchmarks. This study advances the science of benchmarking and helps practitioners deploy AI systems more responsibly.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.