How Should AI Safety Benchmarks Benchmark Safety?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI safety benchmarks are pivotal for safety in advanced AI systems; however, they have significant technical, epistemic, and sociotechnical shortcomings. We present a review of 210 safety benchmarks that maps out common challenges in safety benchmarking, documenting failures and limitations by drawing from engineering sciences and long-established theories of risk and safety. We argue that adhering to established risk management principles, mapping the space of what can(not) be measured, developing robust probabilistic metrics, and efficiently deploying measurement theory to connect benchmarking objectives with the world can significantly improve the validity and usefulness of AI safety benchmarks. The review provides a roadmap on how to improve AI safety benchmarking, and we illustrate the effectiveness of these recommendations through quantitative and qualitative evaluation. We also provide workflow-oriented guiding questions with illustrative benchmark that help researchers and practitioners develop robust and epistemologically sound safety benchmarks. This study advances the science of benchmarking and helps practitioners deploy AI systems more responsibly.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agentscited by 4
- 2026Mind the GAP: Text Safety Does Not Transfer to Tool-Call Safety in LLM Agentscited by 3
- 2026Making AI Evaluation Deployment Relevant Through Context Specificationcited by 1
- 2026Studying People to Study AI: Expert Perspectives on the Epistemic Fit and Barriers of Human Research in AI Safety & Ethicscited by 0
- 2026Searching for "Harmful Refusal": A Psychometric Audit of an AI Safety Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026Searching for "Harmful Refusal": A Psychometric Audit of an AI Safety Benchmark8 Oct 2026
- 2026Studying People to Study AI: Expert Perspectives on the Epistemic Fit and Barriers of Human Research in AI Safety & Ethics6 Aug 2026
- 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents11 Apr 2026
- 2026Making AI Evaluation Deployment Relevant Through Context Specification6 Mar 2026
- 2026Mind the GAP: Text Safety Does Not Transfer to Tool-Call Safety in LLM Agents18 Feb 2026