Locating and Editing Figure-Ground Organization in Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision Transformers must resolve figure-ground organization by choosing between completions driven by local geometric evidence and those favored by global organizational priors, giving rise to a characteristic perceptual ambiguity. We aim to locate where the canonical Gestalt prior convexity is realized within the internal components of BEiT. Using a controlled perceptual conflict based on synthetic shapes of darts, we systematically mask regions that equally admit either a concave completion or a convex completion. We show that BEiT reliably favors convex completion under this competition. Projecting internal activations into the model's discrete visual codebook space via logit attribution reveals that this preference is governed by identifiable functional units within transformer substructures. Specifically, we find that figure-ground organization is ambiguous through early and intermediate layers and resolves abruptly in later layers. By decomposing the direct effect of attention heads, we identify head L0H9 acting as an early seed, introducing a weak bias toward convexity. Downscaling this single attention head shifts the distributional mass of the perceptual conflict across a continuous decision boundary, allowing concave evidence to guide completion.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
- 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
- 2023Characterizing Mechanisms for Factual Recall in Language Modelscited by 47
- 2023Self-attention in Vision Transformers Performs Perceptual Grouping, Not Attentioncited by 15
4 more
- 2022Mixed Evidence for Gestalt Grouping in Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2018Understanding Deep Convolutional Networks through Gestalt Theorycited by 8
- 2025From Local Cues to Global Percepts: Emergent Gestalt Organization in Self-Supervised Vision Modelscited by 7
- 2024Finding Closure: A Closer Look at the Gestalt Law of Closure in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.