mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-attention in Vision Transformers Performs Perceptual Grouping, Not Attention

arXiv 2303.01542 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2023cs.CVcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, a considerable number of studies in computer vision involves deep neural architectures called vision transformers. Visual processing in these models incorporates computational models that are claimed to implement attention mechanisms. Despite an increasing body of work that attempts to understand the role of attention mechanisms in vision transformers, their effect is largely unknown. Here, we asked if the attention mechanisms in vision transformers exhibit similar effects as those known in human visual attention. To answer this question, we revisited the attention formulation in these models and found that despite the name, computationally, these models perform a special class of relaxation labeling with similarity grouping effects. Additionally, whereas modern experimental findings reveal that human visual attention involves both feed-forward and feedback mechanisms, the purely feed-forward architecture of vision transformers suggests that attention in these models will not have the same effects as those known in humans. To quantify these observations, we evaluated grouping performance in a family of vision transformers. Our results suggest that self-attention modules group figures in the stimuli based on similarity in visual features such as color. Also, in a singleton detection experiment as an instance of saliency detection, we studied if these models exhibit similar effects as those of feed-forward visual salience mechanisms utilized in human visual attention. We found that generally, the transformer-based attention modules assign more salience either to distractors or the ground. Together, our study suggests that the attention mechanisms in vision transformers perform similarity grouping and not attention.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2023.

Builds on

43 of 111 references.

References · 43

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  6. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  7. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  8. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
  9. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  10. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,423
  11. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,101
  12. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 947
31 more
  1. 2021CrossViT: Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer for Image Classificationcited by 806
  2. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
  3. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  4. 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 654
  5. 2021CoAtNet: Marrying Convolution and Attention for All Data Sizescited by 569
  6. 2021ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive Biasescited by 484
  7. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  8. 2021Early Convolutions Help Transformers See Bettercited by 396
  9. 2021Bottleneck Transformers for Visual Recognitioncited by 364
  10. 2021CMT: Convolutional Neural Networks Meet Vision Transformerscited by 310
  11. 2022How Do Vision Transformers Work?cited by 307
  12. 2019On the Relationship between Self-Attention and Convolutional Layerscited by 300
  13. 2021Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classificationcited by 249
  14. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 207
  15. 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
  16. 2022Understanding The Robustness in Vision Transformerscited by 144
  17. 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
  18. 2017A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortionscited by 108
  19. 2017Structured Attention Networkscited by 95
  20. 2022What do Vision Transformers Learn? A Visual Explorationcited by 76
  21. 2022Harmonizing the object recognition strategies of deep neural networks with humanscited by 59
  22. 2021Less is More: Pay Less Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 53
  23. 2014Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognitioncited by 50
  24. 2021Vision Transformer with Progressive Samplingcited by 44
  25. 2022A Benchmark for Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 43
  26. 2021ConvNets vs. Transformers: Whose Visual Representations are More Transferable?cited by 35
  27. 2016PsyPhy: A Psychophysics Driven Evaluation Framework for Visual Recognitioncited by 18
  28. 2021Understanding the computational demands underlying visual reasoningcited by 13
  29. 2020Do Saliency Models Detect Odd-One-Out Targets? New Datasets and Evaluationscited by 10
  30. 2020Explicitly Modeled Attention Maps for Image Classificationcited by 3
  31. 2022RDRN: Recursively Defined Residual Network for Image Super-Resolutioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: