mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tool-Genesis: A Task-Driven Tool Creation Benchmark for Self-Evolving Language Agent

arXiv 2603.05578 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research on self-evolving language agents has accelerated, drawing increasing attention to their ability to create, adapt, and maintain tools from task requirements. However, existing benchmarks predominantly rely on predefined specifications, which limits scalability and hinders truly autonomous evolution. While recent studies attempt to dynamically generate tools, they primarily emphasize downstream performance, resulting in a "black-box" evaluation that makes it difficult to attribute failures to specific causes. To address this, we propose Tool-Genesis, a diagnostic benchmark designed to quantify agent capabilities across multiple dimensions, including interface compliance, functional correctness, and downstream utility. Tool-Genesis evaluates whether agents can construct task-relevant tools solely from abstract requirements (without preset specifications) and use them to solve realistic problems. Crucially, we find that even state-of-the-art models struggle to produce precise tool interfaces or executable logic in a one-shot setting. These minor initial flaws are amplified through the pipeline, leading to a sharp degradation in downstream metrics. We hope Tool-Genesis will guide future research toward training and steering models to synthesize persistent, general-purpose tools that better address real-world challenges.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

21 of 46 references.

References · 21

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  4. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  5. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  6. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
  7. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
  8. 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 564
  9. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
  10. 2023Large Language Models as Tool Makerscited by 303
  11. 2024OS-Copilot: Towards Generalist Computer Agents with Self-Improvementcited by 205
  12. 2024StableToolBench: Towards Stable Large-Scale Benchmarking on Tool Learning of Large Language Modelscited by 132
9 more
  1. 2023CRAFT: Customizing LLMs by Creating and Retrieving from Specialized Toolsetscited by 129
  2. 2024Cradle: Empowering Foundation Agents Towards General Computer Controlcited by 117
  3. 2023CREATOR: Tool Creation for Disentangling Abstract and Concrete Reasoning of Large Language Modelscited by 93
  4. 2024Planning, Creation, Usage: Benchmarking LLMs for Comprehensive Tool Utilization in Real-World Complex Scenarioscited by 86
  5. 2025TOUCAN: Synthesizing 1.5M Tool-Agentic Data from Real-World MCP Environmentscited by 69
  6. 2024Tool Learning in the Wild: Empowering Language Models as Automatic Tool Agentscited by 56
  7. 2024ShortcutsBench: A Large-Scale Real-world Benchmark for API-based Agentscited by 36
  8. 2023Toolink: Linking Toolkit Creation and Using through Chain-of-Solving on Open-Source Modelcited by 29
  9. 2024AppBench: Planning of Multiple APIs from Various APPs for Complex User Instructioncited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.